Literature DB >> 26874297

Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women.

George R Saade1, Kim A Boggess2, Scott A Sullivan3, Glenn R Markenson4, Jay D Iams5, Dean V Coonrod6, Leonardo M Pereira7, M Sean Esplin8, Larry M Cousins9, Garrett K Lam10, Matthew K Hoffman11, Robert D Severinsen12, Trina Pugmire12, Jeff S Flick12, Angela C Fox12, Amir J Lueth12, Sharon R Rust12, Emanuele Mazzola13, ChienTing Hsu12, Max T Dufford12, Chad L Bradford12, Ilia E Ichetovkin12, Tracey C Fleischer12, Ashoka D Polpitiya12, Gregory C Critchfield12, Paul E Kearney14, J Jay Boniface12, Durlin E Hickok12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery remains the leading cause of perinatal mortality. Risk factors and biomarkers have traditionally failed to identify the majority of preterm deliveries.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mass spectrometry-based serum test to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in asymptomatic pregnant women. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 5501 pregnant women were enrolled between 17(0/7) and 28(6/7) weeks gestational age in the prospective Proteomic Assessment of Preterm Risk study at 11 sites in the United States between 2011 and 2013. Maternal blood was collected at enrollment and outcomes collected following delivery. Maternal serum was processed by a proteomic workflow, and proteins were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. The discovery and verification process identified 2 serum proteins, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (IBP4) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), as predictors of spontaneous preterm delivery. We evaluated a predictor using the log ratio of the measures of IBP4 and SHBG (IBP4/SHBG) in a clinical validation study to classify spontaneous preterm delivery cases (<37(0/7) weeks gestational age) in a nested case-control cohort different from subjects used in discovery and verification. Strict blinding and independent statistical analyses were employed.
RESULTS: The predictor had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.75 and sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. The IBP4/SHBG predictor at this sensitivity and specificity had an odds ratio of 5.04 for spontaneous preterm delivery. Accuracy of the IBP4/SHBG predictor increased using earlier case-vs-control gestational age cutoffs (eg, <35(0/7) vs ≥35(0/7) weeks gestational age). Importantly, higher-risk subjects defined by the IBP4/SHBG predictor score generally gave birth earlier than lower-risk subjects.
CONCLUSION: A serum-based molecular predictor identifies asymptomatic pregnant women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, which may provide utility in identifying women at risk at an early stage of pregnancy to allow for clinical intervention. This early detection would guide enhanced levels of care and accelerate development of clinical strategies to prevent preterm delivery.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IBP4; IGFBP4; SHBG; biomarker; pregnancy; preterm birth; proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874297     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  34 in total

1.  The maternal plasma proteome changes as a function of gestational age in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Offer Erez; Eli Maymon; Piya Chaemsaithong; Zhonghui Xu; Percy Pacora; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Bogdan Done; Sonia S Hassan; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Identification of Hip BMD Loss and Fracture Risk Markers Through Population-Based Serum Proteomics.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; Jack Wiedrick; Jian Shen; Jon Jacobs; Erin S Baker; Aaron Baraff; Paul Piehowski; Christine G Lee; Arie Baratt; Vladislav Petyuk; Shannon McWeeney; Jeong Youn Lim; Douglas C Bauer; Nancy E Lane; Peggy M Cawthon; Richard D Smith; Jodi Lapidus; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Pre-pregnancy or first-trimester risk scoring to identify women at high risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  Rebecca J Baer; Monica R McLemore; Nancy Adler; Scott P Oltman; Brittany D Chambers; Miriam Kuppermann; Matthew S Pantell; Elizabeth E Rogers; Kelli K Ryckman; Marina Sirota; Larry Rand; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 5.  Screening for spontaneous preterm birth and resultant therapies to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: A review.

Authors:  Angelica V Glover; Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Better Estimation of Spontaneous Preterm Birth Prediction Performance through Improved Gestational Age Dating.

Authors:  Julja Burchard; George R Saade; Kim A Boggess; Glenn R Markenson; Jay D Iams; Dean V Coonrod; Leonardo M Pereira; Matthew K Hoffman; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Ryan Treacy; Angela C Fox; Todd L Randolph; Tracey C Fleischer; Max T Dufford; Thomas J Garite; Gregory C Critchfield; J Jay Boniface; Paul E Kearney
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Evaluation of a Maternal Plasma RNA Panel Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Birth and Its Expansion to the Prediction of Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Carl Philip Weiner; Howard Cuckle; Mark Louis Weiss; Irina Alexandra Buhimschi; Yafeng Dong; Helen Zhou; Risa Ramsey; Robert Egerman; Catalin Sorin Buhimschi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

8.  Cervicovaginal fluid proteomic analysis to identify potential biomarkers for preterm birth.

Authors:  Samuel Parry; Rita Leite; M Sean Esplin; Radek Bukowski; Heping Zhang; Michael Varner; William W Andrews; George R Saade; John Ilekis; Uma M Reddy; Hao Huang; Yoel Sadovsky; Ian A Blair; Joseph Biggio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Integrated trajectories of the maternal metabolome, proteome, and immunome predict labor onset.

Authors:  Ina A Stelzer; Mohammad S Ghaemi; Xiaoyuan Han; Kazuo Ando; Julien J Hédou; Dorien Feyaerts; Laura S Peterson; Kristen K Rumer; Eileen S Tsai; Edward A Ganio; Dyani K Gaudillière; Amy S Tsai; Benjamin Choisy; Lea P Gaigne; Franck Verdonk; Danielle Jacobsen; Sonia Gavasso; Gavin M Traber; Mathew Ellenberger; Natalie Stanley; Martin Becker; Anthony Culos; Ramin Fallahzadeh; Ronald J Wong; Gary L Darmstadt; Maurice L Druzin; Virginia D Winn; Ronald S Gibbs; Xuefeng B Ling; Karl Sylvester; Brendan Carvalho; Michael P Snyder; Gary M Shaw; David K Stevenson; Kévin Contrepois; Martin S Angst; Nima Aghaeepour; Brice Gaudillière
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Verification of a Blood-Based Targeted Proteomics Signature for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ferdinando Cerciello; Meena Choi; Sara L Sinicropi-Yao; Katie Lomeo; Joseph M Amann; Emanuela Felley-Bosco; Rolf A Stahel; Bruce W S Robinson; Jenette Creaney; Harvey I Pass; Olga Vitek; David P Carbone
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.