Literature DB >> 26874141

Reduced Survival in Bariatric Surgery Candidates Delayed or Denied by Lack of Insurance Approval.

Eleisha Flanagan1, Iman Ghaderi, D Wayne Overby, Timothy M Farrell.   

Abstract

Bariatric surgery reduces mortality for Americans who meet candidacy criteria and have insurance coverage. Unfortunately, some medically suitable candidates are denied or delayed during insurance approval processes. The long-term impact of such care delays on survival is unknown. Using a prospectively maintained bariatric intake database, we identified consecutive applicants who were evaluated and medically cleared by our multidisciplinary care team and for whom insurance approval was requested. We compared survival in those who were initially approved by their insurance carriers (controls) and those who were initially denied coverage (subjects). Mortality was determined using the Social Security Death Index. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and the log-rank test for significance was applied. From August 2003 to December 2008, 463 patients (391 females, mean age 45 ± 10 years, mean body mass index 52.5 ± 9.4 kg/m(2)) were medically cleared for a bariatric procedure. Of these, 363 were approved by insurance on initial request, whereas 100 were denied. Given the study's intention to measure the aggregate impact of delays and denials, nine patients who later came to operation after appeal or coverage change were maintained in the subject cohort. During 0- to 113-month follow-up, six subjects (6%) died compared with seven controls (1.9%), corresponding to a statistically significant survival benefit for patients initially approved for bariatric surgery without delay or denial (P < 0.001). In conclusion, access to bariatric surgical care was impeded by insurance certification processes in 22 per cent of medically acceptable candidates. Processes that delay or restrict efficient access to bariatric surgery are associated with a 3-fold mortality increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

1.  The Inequity of Bariatric Surgery: Publicly Insured Patients Undergo Lower Rates of Bariatric Surgery with Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Dietric L Hennings; Maria Baimas-George; Zaid Al-Quarayshi; Rachel Moore; Emad Kandil; Christopher G DuCoin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Bariatric surgery insurance requirements independently predict surgery dropout.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Love; J Hunter Mehaffey; Dana Safavian; Bruce Schirmer; Steven K Malin; Peter T Hallowell; Jennifer L Kirby
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  COVID-19: IFSO LAC Recommendations for the Resumption of Elective Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Estuardo Behrens; Luis Poggi; Sergio Aparicio; Pedro Martínez Duartez; Nelson Rodríguez; Natan Zundel; Almino Ramos Cardoso; Diego Camacho; Juan Antonio López-Corvalá; Marcos Leão Vilas-Bôas; Jorge Laynez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  How Ethical Is Our Current Delivery of Care to Patients with Severe and Complicated Obesity?

Authors:  Hilary Craig; Carel le Roux; Fiona Keogh; Francis M Finucane
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Structured Lifestyle Modification Prior to Bariatric Surgery: How Much is Enough?

Authors:  John Brazil; Francis Finucane
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.