| Literature DB >> 26873678 |
Funmilola OlaOlorun1, Assefa Seme2, Easmon Otupiri3, Peter Ogunjuyigbe4, Amy Tsui5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fertility desires and contraceptive behavior often change over time. This study examined the influence of change in fertility desires on change in modern contraceptive use over time in three peri-urban communities in sub-Saharan Africa.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26873678 PMCID: PMC4751729 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0118-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Percent using modern contraception by fertility desire and selected background characteristics
| Sebeta, Ethiopia | Asawase, Ghana | Ipetumodu, Nigeria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Current use of modern contraception [ | ||||||
| Yes | 660 (66.9) | 454 (61.3) | 99 (12.6) | 67 (10.8) | 224 (29.4) | 176 (36.7) |
| No | 326 (33.1) | 287 (38.7) | 685 (87.4) | 556 (89.3) | 537 (70.6) | 303 (63.3) |
| % of modern contraceptive users: | ||||||
| Fertility desires | ||||||
| Want more | 63.9 | 64.1 | 12.0 | 12.5 | 25.8 | 26.3 |
| No more | 71.3a | 71.9a | 13.9 | 13.0 | 37.2b | 39.0b |
| Education | ||||||
| No formal | 70.2 | 67.5 | 12.0 | 12.8 | 18.4 | 36.4 |
| Primary | 69.4 | 71.4 | 12.9 | 12.8 | 27.5 | 24.8 |
| Secondary | 63.9 | 65.2 | 12.3d | 11.8d | 29.7 | 31.3 |
| Tertiary | 64.9 | 66.3 | 36.3 | 35.8 | ||
| Age group | ||||||
| <25 | 73.6 | 74.6 | 14.1 | 16.7 | 20.8 | 25.5 |
| 25-34 | 71.4 | 72.4 | 14.4 | 14.2 | 28.0 | 28.4 |
| 35-49 | 48.1c | 50.3c | 10.5 | 10.5 | 35.0a | 35.9 |
| Parity | ||||||
| 0-1 | 64.9 | 51.8b | 8.8 | 10.4 | 21.3 | 23.8 |
| 2-3 | 69.8 | 70.3 | 13.5 | 13.8 | 26.7 | 29.4 |
| 4+ | 65.1 | 66.7 | 13.7 | 12.6 | 38.5c | 36.4 |
| Polygyny | ||||||
| No | 67.3 | 67.6 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 28.4 | 29.8 |
| Yes | 63.0 | 69.0 | 5.4 | 6.7 | 31.9 | 32.3 |
| Wealth | ||||||
| Lowest | 73.9 | 73.9 | 14.2 | 15.3 | 21.3 | 26.1 |
| Lower | 69.2 | 70.4 | 16.6 | 14.3 | 29.4 | 29.0 |
| Middle | 71.6 | 72.5 | 12.2 | 13.5 | 33.1 | 30.9 |
| Higher | 63.6 | 63.2 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 32.0 | 35.4 |
| Highest | 56.4b | 57.1b | 11.5 | 9.1 | 31.6 | 31.1 |
a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001; dSecondary/Tertiary
Change in fertility desires between baseline and follow up by site
| Fertility desire | Sebeta, Ethiopia | Asawase, Ghana | Ipetumodu, Nigeria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLLOW UP | |||||||
| Want more | No more | Want more | No more | Want more | No more | ||
| BASELINE | Want more | 78.1 | 21.9 | 77.0 | 23.0 | 77.6 | 22.5 |
| No more | 18.6 | 81.4 | 15.7 | 84.3 | 19.1 | 80.9 | |
Change in modern contraceptive use between baseline and follow up by study site
| Modern contraceptive use status | Sebeta, Ethiopia | Asawase, Ghana | Ipetumodu, Nigeria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLLOW UP | |||||||
| Non-users | Users | Non-users | Users | Non-users | Users | ||
| BASELINE | Non-users | 66.5 | 33.5 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 69.6 | 30.4 |
| Users | 25.0 | 75.0 | 73.4 | 26.6 | 47.6 | 52.4 | |
Adjusted ORs and 95 % CIs showing influence of change in fertility desires on change in modern contraceptive use
| Covariate | ETHIOPIA (UNADJ) | ETHIOPIA (ADJ)d | GHANA (UNADJ) | GHANA (ADJ)d | NIGERIA (UNADJ) | NIGERIA (ADJ)d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fertility desire at baseline (Ref = Want more) | 1.40 (1.06, 1.85)a | 2.03 (1.44, 2.85)c | 1.18 (0.76, 1.84) | 1.30 (0.77, 2.19) | 1.71 (1.23, 2.38)c | 1.60 (1.06, 2.41)a |
| Time (Ref = Baseline) | 0.68 (0.54, 0.86)c | 0.66 (0.51, 0.85)c | 0.49 (0.28, 0.84)a | 0.49 (0.28, 0.84)a | 1.28 (0.92, 1.79) | 1.21 (0.86, 1.72) |
| Baseline fertility desire X Time | 1.32 (0.92, 1.90) | 1.32 (0.89, 1.97) | 2.71 (1.31, 5.62)a | 2.59 (1.24, 5.41)a | 1.13 (0.70, 1.85) | 1.28 (0.77, 2.13) |
| Time + Baseline fertility desire X Time | 0.90 (0.69, 1.18) | 0.87 (0.64, 1.17) | 1.32 (0.85, 2.05) | 1.26 (0.80, 1.97) | 1.45 (1.02, 2.07)a | 1.55 (1.07, 2.26)a |
| Constant | 1.77 (1.50, 2.09)c | 0.82 (0.48, 1.39) | 0.14 (0.10, 0.18)c | 0.07 (0.03, 0.17)c | 0.35 (0.28, 0.43)c | 0.07 (0.03, 0.19)c |
a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001
dModels were adjusted for age, parity, educational level, wealth and polygyny
Ethiopia: Sebeta; Ghana: Asawase; Nigeria: Ipetomodu
(For these generalized linear models with an underlying binomial distribution, an exchangeable correlation structure was assumed and robust variances estimated, using maximum likelihood estimation.)
X: multiplication