Literature DB >> 26873420

Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.

Rosiane Yamasaki1, Glaucya Madazio2, Sylvia H S Leão3, Marina Padovani4, Renata Azevedo5, Mara Behlau6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) determine the cutoff values of the overall severity (OS) of vocal deviation on the visual analog scale (VAS) based on the ratings of the numerical scale (NS); and (2) verify the power of discrimination of these cutoff values according to different degrees of vocal deviation. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective study.
METHODS: The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by four speech-language pathologists who used two protocols with different scalar properties: the VAS and the 4-point NS. Vocal samples from142 women and 69 men, plus 10% of repetition, with and without vocal complaints, ranging from 19 to 60 years were included. The analyzed speaking task was the counting from 1 to 10. For both protocols, the judges rated the OS.
RESULTS: Based on the correspondence between the two scales, the cutoff values of the OS on the VAS obtained were 35.5, 50.5, and 90.5 points. The 35.5 value corresponds to the cutoff point between normal variability and mild/moderate vocal deviations; the 50.5 value corresponds to the cutoff point between mild/moderate and moderate vocal deviations; the 90.5 value corresponds to the cutoff point between moderate and severe deviations. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the three cutoff values were 0.918, 0.948, and 0.970, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff values of the OS on the VAS were obtained, and the areas under the ROC curve showed that all the three cutoff points had excellent accuracy that represents a higher power of discrimination of different degrees of vocal deviations.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory-perceptual evaluation; Dysphonia; Rating scales; Vocal screening; Voice assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873420     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  6 in total

1.  GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem.

Authors:  Marina Englert; Viviana Mendoza; Mara Behlau; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  Cut-off point for high dysphonia risk in children based on the Child Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Giovana Kaila Santos Batista; Marcia Simões-Zenari; Kátia Nemr
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Supracricoid Laryngectomy: The Function of the Remaining Arytenoid in Voice and Swallowing.

Authors:  Elaine Cristina Pires Buzaneli; Marcia Simões Zenari; Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar; Rogerio A Dedivitis; Cláudio Roberto Cernea; Kátia Nemr
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-29

4.  Body mass index and acoustic voice parameters: is there a relationship?

Authors:  Lourdes Bernadete Rocha de Souza; Marquiony Marques Dos Santos
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-06

5.  Development and validation of the protocol for the evaluation of voice in patients with hearing impairment (PEV-SHI).

Authors:  Ana Cristina Coelho; Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto; Fayez Bahmad
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-03

6.  Performance of the phonatory deviation diagram in the evaluation of rough and breathy synthesized voices.

Authors:  Leonardo Wanderley Lopes; Jonas Almeida de Freitas; Anna Alice Almeida; Priscila Oliveira Costa Silva; Giorvan Ânderson Dos Santos Alves
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.