Literature DB >> 26873419

Modified glycan models of pig-to-human xenotransplantation do not enhance the human-anti-pig T cell response.

James R Butler1, Zheng-Yu Wang1, Gregory R Martens1, Joseph M Ladowski1, Ping Li1, Matthew Tector1, A Joseph Tector2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Genetically modified porcine models of pig-to-human xenotransplantation offer the most immediate answer to a growing shortage of available solid organs. Recently a modified porcine glycan model has been discovered that reduces human antibody binding to levels comparable with allograft standards. As this background provides an answer to the problem of acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR), it is important to consider the impact these modifications have on measures of cell-mediated rejection. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of currently relevant glycan knockout models of pig-to-human xenotransplantation in a lymphocyte proliferation assay. To accomplish these goals, genetically modified pigs were created through CRISPR/Cas9-directed silencing of the GGTA1, and CMAH genes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and spleen cells were obtained from these animals and used as a source of stimulation for human responders in one-way mixed lymphocyte reactions. The response was tested in the presence and absence of clinically available immunomodifiers.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant glycan knockout models of pig-to-human xenotransplantation do not enhance the human-anti-pig cellular response. Currently available and conventional immunosuppression has the capacity to mediate the human xenogeneic T cell response to these knockout cells.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular responses; Glycan; Sialic acid; T cell; Xenotransplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873419     DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  7 in total

1.  Immune Responses of HLA Highly Sensitized and Nonsensitized Patients to Genetically Engineered Pig Cells.

Authors:  Zhongqiang Zhang; Hidetaka Hara; Cassandra Long; Hayato Iwase; Haizhi Qi; Camila Macedo; Massimo Mangiola; Adriana Zeevi; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Martin Wijkstrom
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Therapeutic gene editing: delivery and regulatory perspectives.

Authors:  Gayong Shim; Dongyoon Kim; Gyu Thae Park; Hyerim Jin; Soo-Kyung Suh; Yu-Kyoung Oh
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9 Gene Editing Technique in Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Meisam Naeimi Kararoudi; Seyyed S Hejazi; Ezgi Elmas; Mats Hellström; Maryam Naeimi Kararoudi; Arvind M Padma; Dean Lee; Hamid Dolatshad
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  The human T-cell proliferative response to triple-knockout pig cells in mixed lymphocyte reaction.

Authors:  Zheng-Yu Wang; Mahmoud Morsi; Huy Quoc Nguyen; Mohamed Bikhet; KaLia Burnette; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 5.  Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Adoptive transfer of xenoantigen‑stimulated T cell receptor Vβ‑restricted human regulatory T cells prevents porcine islet xenograft rejection in humanized mice.

Authors:  Xi Jin; Min Hu; Lina Gong; Huifang Li; Yan Wang; Ming Ji; Hong Li
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  HLA-G1+ Expression in GGTA1KO Pigs Suppresses Human and Monkey Anti-Pig T, B and NK Cell Responses.

Authors:  Joseph Sushil Rao; Nora Hosny; Ramesh Kumbha; Raza Ali Naqvi; Amar Singh; Zachary Swanson; Heather Levy; Anders W Matson; Magie Steinhoff; Nicole Forneris; Eric Walters; Bernhard J Hering; Christopher Burlak
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.