Literature DB >> 26873275

The contribution of surprise to the prediction based modulation of fMRI responses.

Catarina Amado1, Petra Hermann2, Petra Kovács3, Mareike Grotheer4, Zoltán Vidnyánszky3, Gyula Kovács5.   

Abstract

In recent years, several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies showed that correct stimulus predictions reduce the neural responses when compared to surprising events (Egner et al., 2010). Further, it has been shown that such fulfilled expectations enhance the magnitude of repetition suppression (RS, i.e. a decreased neuronal response after the repetition of a given stimulus) in face selective visual cortex as well (Summerfield et al., 2008). Current MEG and neuroimaging studies suggest that the underlying mechanisms of expectation effects are independent from these of RS (Grotheer and Kovács, 2015; Todorovic and Lange, 2012). However, it is not clear as of today how perceptual expectations modulate the neural responses: is the difference between correctly predicted and surprising stimuli due to a genuine response reduction for correctly predicted stimuli or is it due to an increased response for surprising stimuli? Therefore, here we used a modified version of the paradigm of Grotheer and Kovács (2015) to induce predictions independently from repetition probability by presenting pairs of faces (female, male or infant) that were either repeated or alternating. Orthogonally to this, predictions were manipulated by the gender of the first face within each pair so that it signaled high, low or equal probability of repetitions. An unpredicted, neutral condition with equal probabilities for alternating and repeated trials was used to identify the role of surprising and enhancing modulations. Similarly, to Grotheer and Kovács (2015), we found significant RS and significant expectation effect in the FFA. Importantly, we observed larger response for surprising events in comparison to the neutral and correctly predicted conditions for alternating trials. Altogether, these results emphasize the role of surprise in prediction effects.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expectation; Prediction; Repetition suppression; Surprise; fMRI adaptation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873275     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Separate neural representations of prediction error valence and surprise: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elsa Fouragnan; Chris Retzler; Marios G Philiastides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area.

Authors:  Auréliane Pajani; Sid Kouider; Paul Roux; Vincent de Gardelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Neuroimaging results suggest the role of prediction in cross-domain priming.

Authors:  Catarina Amado; Petra Kovács; Rebecca Mayer; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Sabrina Trapp; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Perceptual Expectations of Object Stimuli Modulate Repetition Suppression in a Delayed Repetition Design.

Authors:  Lisa Kronbichler; Sarah Said-Yürekli; Martin Kronbichler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Similar Expectation Effects for Immediate and Delayed Stimulus Repetitions.

Authors:  Catarina Amado; Sophie-Marie Rostalski; Mareike Grotheer; Nadine Wanke; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Functional MRI study in a case of Charles Bonnet syndrome related to LHON.

Authors:  V Vacchiano; C Tonon; M Mitolo; S Evangelisti; M Carbonelli; R Liguori; R Lodi; V Carelli; C La Morgia
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.474

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.