Literature DB >> 26872997

Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Julian Joestl1, Marcus Hofbauer2, Nikolaus Lang2, Thomas Tiefenboeck2, Stefan Hajdu2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Revision arthroplasty is currently the recommended treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and stem loosening (Vancouver B2). However, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) utilizing locking compression plate (LCP) might be an effective treatment with a reduced surgical time and less complex procedure in a typically elderly patient collective with multiple comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes in two cohorts with Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary THA, treated either by ORIF with LCP fixation, or by revision arthroplasty utilizing a non-cemented long femoral stem.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 patients with Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures following THA, who had been treated between 2000 and 2014, were reviewed. Eight fractures were treated with LCP fixation, fourteen fractures with the first-generation revision prosthesis (Helios), and fourteen fractures with the second-generation revision prosthesis (Hyperion). The patients were assessed clinically with the Parker mobility score and radiographically.
RESULTS: A total of ten males and 26 females formed the basis of this report with an average age of 81 years (range, 64 to 96 years). All fractures treated with LCP fixation alone healed uneventfully and there were no signs of secondary stem migration, malalignement or plate breakage. The average surgical time was shorter in the ORIF cohort; however, the results were not statistically significant. The postoperative Parker mobility score at latest follow-up showed no difference between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the current study, we conclude that the use of LCP fixation can be a sufficient option for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures correspondingly with femoral stem loosening.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral Stem Loosening; Locking Compression Plate (LCP), Revision Arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fractures; Total hip arthroplasty (THA); Vancouver B2

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872997     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.

Authors:  Sagi Martinov; Sebastien D'ulisse; Edouard Haumont; Dragos Schiopu; Pieter Reynders; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.

Authors:  Mauro Spina; Andrea Scalvi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 3.  Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David González-Martín; Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Mario Herrera-Pérez; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Miriam Garrido-Miguel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Toby Jennison; Rathan Yarlagadda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  The location of the fracture determines the better solution, osteosynthesis or revision, in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Okudera; Hiroaki Kijima; Shin Yamada; Natsuo Konishi; Hitoshi Kubota; Hiroshi Tazawa; Takayuki Tani; Norio Suzuki; Keiji Kamo; Masashi Fujii; Ken Sasaki; Tetsuya Kawano; Yosuke Iwamoto; Itsuki Nagahata; Takanori Miura; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-06

6.  Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Vancouver B2 Fracture Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. A Multicenter Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Biberthaler; Patrick Pflüger; Markus Wurm; Marc Hanschen; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Joseph Aderinto; George Whitwell; Peter V Giannoudis; Nikolaos Kanakaris
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.884

7.  Case report: A 10 years follow-up of periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty in osteopetrosis.

Authors:  Zhan-Feng Zhang; Dan Wang; Li-Dong Wu; Xue-Song Dai
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-10

8.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate.

Authors:  C Baum; M Leimbacher; P Kriechling; A Platz; D Cadosch
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-24

9.  Outcome of surgical treatment of 54 Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty at mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Daniele Fabbri; Matteo Romantini; Massimo Laus; Alfonso Calogero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-03

10.  Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Michael Blauth; Alexander Joeris; Andrea Blumenthal; Elke Rometsch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.