Literature DB >> 26872924

Viability of the Happy Factor™ targeted selective treatment approach on several sheep farms in Scotland.

David McBean1, Mintu Nath2, Nicola Lambe3, Claire Morgan-Davies3, Fiona Kenyon4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the use of Happy Factor™ weight based targeted selective treatment (TST) on several commercial farms in Scotland in combination with findings from a long term trial on a research farm to assess the potential for TST use in varying farming operations as an alternative to the current regimen of whole flock treatment. Lambs on each farm were regularly weighed and climatic conditions and pasture availability measured for inclusion into the Happy Factor™ model to calculate weight targets. Half of the lambs were allocated to TST treatment and any failing to reach the weight target was treated with the anthelmintic of choice on that farm, while the remaining half of each flock was treated with anthelmintic as per normal practice on that farm (routine treatment, RT). The research farm (farm 1) hosted a long term trial using four anthelmintic treatment regimes over 6 years, and data from two regimes are presented here, alongside findings from three further farms: two commercial enterprises (farms 2 and 3) and a research farm operating as a commercial analogue with two breeds (farms 4a and 4b). The effect of TST strategy on lamb productivity and the number of anthelmintic treatments was investigated. There was no evidence (p>0.300) that mean bodyweight or growth rate was different between TST and RT groups on any of the farms and 95% confidence intervals of TST and RT groups generally suggested that TST had negligible unfavourable effects on the average growth of lambs for most of the farms. Growth rates ranged from 97.39 to 189.16g/day reflecting the varied nature of the farms. All commercial farms used significantly less (1.34 RT versus 1.14 TST treatments per animal, p<0.05) anthelmintic in lambs following TST, with a reduction from 1, 1, 1.03 and 1.14 to 0.77, 0.57, 0.82 and 0.81 in the number of treatments per animal for farms 2, 3, 4a and 4b respectively. This study suggests that TST is a viable means of controlling parasitic disease without incurring production losses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal nematodes; Refugia; Sheep; Targeted selective treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872924     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  3 in total

1.  Investigating the benefits of targeted selective treatment according to average daily weight gain against gastrointestinal nematodes in Morada Nova lambs.

Authors:  Isabella Barbosa Dos Santos; Luís Adriano Anholeto; Gustavo Avelar de Sousa; Alessandra da Silva Nucci; Yousmel Alemán Gainza; Amanda Figueiredo; Leonardo Aparecido Lima Dos Santos; Alessandro Pelegrine Minho; Waldomiro Barioni-Junior; Sérgio Novita Esteves; Simone Cristina Méo Niciura; Ana Carolina de Souza Chagas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.383

2.  Efficacy of essential oils from plants cultivated in the Amazonian Biome against gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep.

Authors:  Ana Carolina S Chagas; Amanda Figueiredo; Flávio A S Politi; Isabela J Moro; Sérgio N Esteves; Humberto R Bizzo; Paola E Gama; Francisco C M Chaves
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2018-05-12

3.  Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infections in grazing yearling beef cattle in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Murray Jelinski; John Gilleard; Lisa Rocheleau; Grant Royan; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.008

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.