Ralf Anding1, Phillip Smith2, Tom de Jong3, Christos Constantinou4, Linda Cardozo5, Peter Rosier6. 1. Department of Neuro-Urology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany. 2. Department of Surgery, UConn Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut. 3. Department of Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital UMC, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 5. Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Urology, UMC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: An ICI-RS Think Tank in 2014 discussed and evaluated the evidence for adding video and EMG to urodynamics (UDS) in children and also highlighted evidence gaps, with the aim of recommending further clinical and research protocols. METHODS: A systematic analysis of the relevant literature for both X-ray (video) studies and electromyography, in combination with UDS in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), is summarized in this manuscript. The technical aspects are also critically reviewed. RESULTS: The body of evidence for the addition of X-ray (video) to filling and voiding cystometry and the evidence for the addition of pelvic muscle surface electromyography to urodynamics is scanty and insufficient. Standards are poor and variable so uncontrolled expert opinion dominates practice. CONCLUSIONS: The Think Tank has recommended that standardized ALARA ("As Low As Reasonably Achievable") principles should be adopted for video-urodynamics in children. The risk-benefit balance of X-ray exposure needs to be better evaluated and defined. Evaluation of images should be standardized and the association with pressure changes better analyzed and reported. Children's pelvic muscle surface electromyography technique should be standardized, technically improved, and its diagnostic relevance should be better evaluated.
AIMS: An ICI-RS Think Tank in 2014 discussed and evaluated the evidence for adding video and EMG to urodynamics (UDS) in children and also highlighted evidence gaps, with the aim of recommending further clinical and research protocols. METHODS: A systematic analysis of the relevant literature for both X-ray (video) studies and electromyography, in combination with UDS in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), is summarized in this manuscript. The technical aspects are also critically reviewed. RESULTS: The body of evidence for the addition of X-ray (video) to filling and voiding cystometry and the evidence for the addition of pelvic muscle surface electromyography to urodynamics is scanty and insufficient. Standards are poor and variable so uncontrolled expert opinion dominates practice. CONCLUSIONS: The Think Tank has recommended that standardized ALARA ("As Low As Reasonably Achievable") principles should be adopted for video-urodynamics in children. The risk-benefit balance of X-ray exposure needs to be better evaluated and defined. Evaluation of images should be standardized and the association with pressure changes better analyzed and reported. Children's pelvic muscle surface electromyography technique should be standardized, technically improved, and its diagnostic relevance should be better evaluated.