Literature DB >> 26872511

Service user led organisations in mental health today.

Diana Rose1, Dee MacDonald2, Aaron Wilson1, Mike Crawford3, Marian Barnes2, Edward Omeni1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1990, health policy in England has stressed the importance of user involvement in shaping and delivering services. AIMS: To explore mental health service user-led organisations (ULOs) in England, as they interact with decision-makers to bring about change desired by them with a focus on institutional norms behaviour and specialised knowledge impacting service users' relationships with services.
METHOD: An ethnography of five ULOs in two provider organisations (NHS Trusts) including observing their meetings and interactions with decision-makers, conducting in-depth interviews and collecting reflective diaries kept by two members of each group.
RESULTS: During the study, one group ceased to operate. This was a group which refused to adopt the institutional rules and norms of managerial discourse. The other four groups survived by navigating the changing environment which existed at the time of the study, although often at some cost. Themes of autonomy and leadership were also identified.
CONCLUSION: The current environment is one of the organisational complexity and change and the place of ULOs is an ambiguous one as they strive to maintain autonomy whilst at the same time being an acceptable voice to managers.

Keywords:  Service user led organisations; patient and public involvement; service user involvement; user led organisations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872511     DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  6 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of a Recovery College Fidelity Measure.

Authors:  Rebecca Toney; Jane Knight; Kate Hamill; Anna Taylor; Claire Henderson; Adam Crowther; Sara Meddings; Skye Barbic; Helen Jennings; Kristian Pollock; Peter Bates; Julie Repper; Mike Slade
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Patients as Agents in Behavioral Health Research and Service Provision: Recommendations to Support the Learning Health System.

Authors:  Hannah K Galvin; Carolyn Petersen; Vignesh Subbian; Anthony Solomonides
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.

Authors:  Angela Filipe; Alicia Renedo; Cicely Marston
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Authentic engagement: A conceptual model for welcoming diverse and challenging consumer and survivor views in mental health research, policy, and practice.

Authors:  Indigo Daya; Bridget Hamilton; Cath Roper
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 5.  Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.

Authors:  Helen Jennings; Mike Slade; Peter Bates; Emma Munday; Rebecca Toney
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Vulnerability as practice in diagnosing multiple conditions.

Authors:  Lindsay-Ann Coyle; Sarah Atkinson
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2018-06-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.