Literature DB >> 26872305

Benchmarking novel approaches for modelling species range dynamics.

Damaris Zurell1, Wilfried Thuiller2,3, Jörn Pagel4, Juliano S Cabral5,6, Tamara Münkemüller2,3, Dominique Gravel7, Stefan Dullinger8, Signe Normand9, Katja H Schiffers2,3,10, Kara A Moore11, Niklaus E Zimmermann1,12.   

Abstract

Increasing biodiversity loss due to climate change is one of the most vital challenges of the 21st century. To anticipate and mitigate biodiversity loss, models are needed that reliably project species' range dynamics and extinction risks. Recently, several new approaches to model range dynamics have been developed to supplement correlative species distribution models (SDMs), but applications clearly lag behind model development. Indeed, no comparative analysis has been performed to evaluate their performance. Here, we build on process-based, simulated data for benchmarking five range (dynamic) models of varying complexity including classical SDMs, SDMs coupled with simple dispersal or more complex population dynamic models (SDM hybrids), and a hierarchical Bayesian process-based dynamic range model (DRM). We specifically test the effects of demographic and community processes on model predictive performance. Under current climate, DRMs performed best, although only marginally. Under climate change, predictive performance varied considerably, with no clear winners. Yet, all range dynamic models improved predictions under climate change substantially compared to purely correlative SDMs, and the population dynamic models also predicted reasonable extinction risks for most scenarios. When benchmarking data were simulated with more complex demographic and community processes, simple SDM hybrids including only dispersal often proved most reliable. Finally, we found that structural decisions during model building can have great impact on model accuracy, but prior system knowledge on important processes can reduce these uncertainties considerably. Our results reassure the clear merit in using dynamic approaches for modelling species' response to climate change but also emphasize several needs for further model and data improvement. We propose and discuss perspectives for improving range projections through combination of multiple models and for making these approaches operational for large numbers of species.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; demographic models; dispersal; population viability; prediction; simulated data; species distribution models; virtual ecologist approach

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872305      PMCID: PMC4972146          DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  16 in total

1.  Climate change impacts on tree ranges: model intercomparison facilitates understanding and quantification of uncertainty.

Authors:  Alissar Cheaib; Vincent Badeau; Julien Boe; Isabelle Chuine; Christine Delire; Eric Dufrêne; Christophe François; Emmanuel S Gritti; Myriam Legay; Christian Pagé; Wilfried Thuiller; Nicolas Viovy; Paul Leadley
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 2.  Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century.

Authors:  Henrique M Pereira; Paul W Leadley; Vânia Proença; Rob Alkemade; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Juan F Fernandez-Manjarrés; Miguel B Araújo; Patricia Balvanera; Reinette Biggs; William W L Cheung; Louise Chini; H David Cooper; Eric L Gilman; Sylvie Guénette; George C Hurtt; Henry P Huntington; Georgina M Mace; Thierry Oberdorff; Carmen Revenga; Patrícia Rodrigues; Robert J Scholes; Ussif Rashid Sumaila; Matt Walpole
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis.

Authors:  Dominique Gravel; Charles D Canham; Marilou Beaudet; Christian Messier
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models.

Authors:  David A Keith; H Resit Akçakaya; Wilfried Thuiller; Guy F Midgley; Richard G Pearson; Steven J Phillips; Helen M Regan; Miguel B Araújo; Tony G Rebelo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Variation in habitat suitability does not always relate to variation in species' plant functional traits.

Authors:  Wilfried Thuiller; Cécile H Albert; Anne Dubuis; Christophe Randin; Antoine Guisan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Statistical inference for stochastic simulation models--theory and application.

Authors:  Florian Hartig; Justin M Calabrese; Björn Reineking; Thorsten Wiegand; Andreas Huth
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances.

Authors:  Isabelle Boulangeat; Dominique Gravel; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity.

Authors:  Céline Bellard; Cleo Bertelsmeier; Paul Leadley; Wilfried Thuiller; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  A road map for integrating eco-evolutionary processes into biodiversity models.

Authors:  Wilfried Thuiller; Tamara Münkemüller; Sébastien Lavergne; David Mouillot; Nicolas Mouquet; Katja Schiffers; Dominique Gravel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change.

Authors:  B J Anderson; H R Akçakaya; M B Araújo; D A Fordham; E Martinez-Meyer; W Thuiller; B W Brook
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  19 in total

1.  Optimisation Model of Dispersal Simulations on a Dendritic Habitat Network.

Authors:  Henriette Heer; Lucas Streib; Mira Kattwinkel; Ralf B Schäfer; Stefan Ruzika
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Predicting population responses to environmental change from individual-level mechanisms: towards a standardized mechanistic approach.

Authors:  A S A Johnston; R J Boyd; J W Watson; A Paul; L C Evans; E L Gardner; V L Boult
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  When Climate Reshuffles Competitors: A Call for Experimental Macroecology.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Jeffrey M Diez; Simon P Hart; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Modeling impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of six endemic baobab species in Madagascar.

Authors:  Jun-Nan Wan; Ndungu J Mbari; Sheng-Wei Wang; Bing Liu; Brian N Mwangi; Jean R E Rasoarahona; Hai-Ping Xin; Ya-Dong Zhou; Qing-Feng Wang
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2020-07-18

5.  Can Aquatic Plants Keep Pace with Climate Change?

Authors:  Duarte S Viana
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Likelihood of changes in forest species suitability, distribution, and diversity under future climate: The case of Southern Europe.

Authors:  Sergio Noce; Alessio Collalti; Monia Santini
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Life history trade-off moderates model predictions of diversity loss from climate change.

Authors:  Helen Moor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long-distance migratory birds threatened by multiple independent risks from global change.

Authors:  Damaris Zurell; Catherine H Graham; Laure Gallien; Wilfried Thuiller; Niklaus E Zimmermann
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2018-10-22

9.  Soil and forest structure predicts large-scale patterns of occurrence and local abundance of a widespread Amazonian frog.

Authors:  Robert Jehle; Adam J Stow; Albertina P Lima; Anthony S Ferreira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Lags in the response of mountain plant communities to climate change.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Loïc Chalmandrier; Jonathan Lenoir; Treena I Burgess; Franz Essl; Sylvia Haider; Christoph Kueffer; Keith McDougall; Ann Milbau; Martin A Nuñez; Aníbal Pauchard; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Lisa J Rew; Nathan J Sanders; Loïc Pellissier
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.