Literature DB >> 26872025

The Early Years of Practice: An Assessment of Operative Efficiency and Cost of Free Flap and Implant Breast Reconstruction at an Academic Institution.

Ian C Sando1, Adeyiza O Momoh1, Kevin C Chung1, Jeffrey H Kozlow1.   

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term costs, and financial implications of improvements in operative efficiency of free flap and implant-based breast reconstruction within an academic practice. Methods The billing records of 162 patients who underwent postmastectomy implant-based or free flap breast reconstruction by two newly hired microsurgeons at an academic institution during the 2011, 2012, and 2013 fiscal years were reviewed. Actual data on professional revenue, relative value units (RVUs), and facility costs for the first stage of reconstruction as well as costs of postoperative complications were assessed. Results Free flaps consistently generated more revenue and RVUs than implants (p < 0.001). Rates of major complications and associated costs were greater for free flaps during the first 2 years of practice; however, by the 3rd year rates were similar between free flaps and implants (14.3 vs. 18.2%, p = 0.72). There was a 26% reduction in free flap operative time in 2013 as compared with 2011. Operative efficiency (hourly RVU) of first stage procedures increased each year for both modalities. At the completion of reconstruction, flaps and implants had comparable hourly reimbursement ($1,053 vs. $947, p = 0.72) and hourly RVU (22 vs. 29, p = 0.06). Conclusions Contrary to perceptions that free flap breast reconstructions are financially inefficient for the surgeon, we have found that these complex reconstructive procedures are profitable. Even in the early years of practice, hourly reimbursements from completed flap reconstructions are similar to reimbursements received from similar staged implant reconstructions. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872025     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1571197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of Variability in Operative Efficiency in Plastic Surgery Procedures.

Authors:  Alexis L Boson; Evan Ross; Daniel Popp; Christian Tapking; Arianna Ramirez; Ludwik Branski; Linda G Phillips; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  A Cross-Sectional Study of Variations in Reimbursement for Breast Reconstruction: Is A Healthcare Disparity On the Horizon?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Alexandra C Schmidt; Terence M Myckatyn; Donald W Buck
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Variation in Payment per Work Relative Value Unit for Breast Reconstruction and Nonbreast Microsurgical Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Clifford C Sheckter; Avraham Sheinin; David Rubin; Nicholas L Berlin; Babak Mehrara; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Disparities in Access to Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  David J Restrepo; Maria T Huayllani; Daniel Boczar; Andrea Sisti; Minh-Doan T Nguyen; Jordan J Cochuyt; Aaron C Spaulding; Brian D Rinker; Galen Perdikis; Antonio J Forte
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Exploring Plastic Surgeon Practice Patterns and Perspectives.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dean Shumway; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.