Literature DB >> 26870510

Crystal structure of piperazine-1,4-diium bis-(4-amino-benzene-sulfonate).

K Sathesh Kumar1, S Ranjith1, S Sudhakar2, P Srinivasan3, M N Ponnuswamy4.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title salt, C4H12N2 (2+)·2C6H6NO3S(-), consists of half a piperazindiium dication, located about an inversion centre, and a 4-amino-benzene-sulfonate anion. The piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, the cations and anions are linked via N-H⋯O and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional framework. Within the framework there are C-H⋯π inter-actions and the N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds result in the formation of R 4 (4)(22) and R 3 (4)(13) ring motifs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-amino­benzene­sulfonate; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; piperazine; three-dimensional framework

Year:  2015        PMID: 26870510      PMCID: PMC4719991          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For examples of the the numerous biological activities of piperazines and their various salts, see: Kaur et al. (2010 ▸); Eswaran et al. (2010 ▸); Chou et al. (2010 ▸); Chen et al. (2004 ▸); Shingalapur et al. (2009 ▸); Shchekotikhin et al. (2005 ▸); Faist et al. (2012 ▸); Kulig et al. (2007 ▸). For a related structure, see: Wei (2011 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H12N2 2+·2C6H6NO3S− M = 432.52 Orthorhombic, a = 10.1709 (4) Å b = 8.4461 (3) Å c = 21.5569 (9) Å V = 1851.83 (12) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.33 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.22 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▸) T min = 0.920, T max = 0.939 31521 measured reflections 2731 independent reflections 2130 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.039

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.107 S = 1.03 2731 reflections 160 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.73 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▸); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262fig1.tif The mol­ecular structure of the title salt, with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. The unlabelled atoms of the cation are related to the labelled atoms by inversion symmetry (- x + 2, − y, − z + 1). Click here for additional data file. a a c . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262fig2.tif A partial view of the crystal packing of the title salt, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen-bonded chains (dashed lines) run along the a and c axes (see Table 1). Click here for additional data file. b b . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262fig3.tif Crystal packing of the title salt, viewed along the b axis, illustrating the formation of the hydrogen-bonded (dashed lines) mol­ecular ribbons running along the b axis direction (see Table 1). For the sake of clarity, H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds have been omitted. Click here for additional data file. a . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015024457/su5262fig4.tif A view along the a axis of the crystal packing of the title salt. The hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (Table 1), and H atoms not involved in these inter­actions have been omitted for clarity. CCDC reference: 1443504 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H12N22+·2C6H6NO3SF(000) = 912
Mr = 432.52Dx = 1.551 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2731 reflections
a = 10.1709 (4) Åθ = 2.8–30.8°
b = 8.4461 (3) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 21.5569 (9) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1851.83 (12) Å3Block, white crystalline
Z = 40.25 × 0.22 × 0.19 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer2731 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2130 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.039
ω and φ scansθmax = 30.8°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −14→14
Tmin = 0.920, Tmax = 0.939k = −12→10
31521 measured reflectionsl = −29→30
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.107w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0431P)2 + 1.5618P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2731 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.73 e Å3
160 parametersΔρmin = −0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0332 (17)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.65542 (16)0.21272 (19)0.21371 (7)0.0266 (3)
C20.72879 (17)0.09868 (19)0.24541 (8)0.0302 (3)
H20.79860.04900.22550.036*
C30.69927 (16)0.05863 (19)0.30585 (8)0.0290 (3)
H30.7489−0.01790.32620.035*
C40.59536 (15)0.13233 (18)0.33669 (7)0.0245 (3)
C50.52268 (16)0.24672 (19)0.30563 (8)0.0280 (3)
H50.45400.29760.32600.034*
C60.55133 (16)0.2859 (2)0.24479 (8)0.0292 (3)
H60.50090.36150.22440.035*
C70.97012 (19)0.0404 (2)0.43662 (8)0.0317 (4)
C80.8928 (2)0.0027 (2)0.54312 (9)0.0358 (4)
N10.68534 (18)0.2535 (2)0.15357 (7)0.0380 (4)
N20.89658 (17)0.11265 (18)0.48903 (7)0.0331 (3)
O10.5723 (2)−0.09171 (16)0.41653 (7)0.0586 (5)
O20.41824 (14)0.1269 (2)0.42189 (6)0.0514 (4)
O30.63822 (14)0.16386 (17)0.45474 (6)0.0413 (3)
S10.55342 (4)0.07560 (5)0.412784 (18)0.02600 (14)
H2B0.934 (2)0.207 (3)0.5007 (11)0.046 (6)*
H1A0.744 (2)0.202 (3)0.1367 (11)0.042 (6)*
H7A0.971 (2)0.119 (3)0.4049 (11)0.042 (6)*
H1B0.635 (2)0.318 (3)0.1336 (11)0.047 (6)*
H8B0.853 (2)0.057 (3)0.5758 (11)0.046 (6)*
H2A0.819 (3)0.132 (3)0.4765 (11)0.046 (6)*
H7B0.924 (2)−0.044 (3)0.4239 (10)0.033 (5)*
H8A0.842 (2)−0.089 (3)0.5299 (10)0.045 (6)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0248 (7)0.0274 (7)0.0278 (7)−0.0045 (6)−0.0003 (6)−0.0017 (6)
C20.0275 (8)0.0283 (7)0.0349 (8)0.0040 (6)0.0058 (6)−0.0030 (6)
C30.0274 (8)0.0261 (7)0.0336 (8)0.0045 (6)−0.0003 (6)0.0024 (6)
C40.0249 (7)0.0222 (7)0.0266 (7)−0.0019 (6)0.0005 (6)−0.0004 (6)
C50.0258 (7)0.0261 (7)0.0319 (8)0.0030 (6)0.0040 (6)0.0009 (6)
C60.0258 (8)0.0300 (8)0.0318 (8)0.0030 (6)−0.0009 (6)0.0064 (7)
C70.0423 (10)0.0247 (7)0.0282 (8)−0.0012 (7)−0.0005 (7)−0.0003 (6)
C80.0379 (10)0.0366 (9)0.0328 (9)0.0006 (8)0.0060 (7)−0.0005 (7)
N10.0366 (8)0.0500 (10)0.0275 (7)0.0068 (8)0.0036 (6)0.0022 (7)
N20.0366 (8)0.0265 (7)0.0362 (8)0.0072 (6)−0.0033 (7)−0.0028 (6)
O10.1135 (16)0.0226 (7)0.0395 (8)0.0040 (8)0.0162 (8)0.0038 (5)
O20.0303 (7)0.0879 (12)0.0361 (7)0.0069 (7)0.0056 (6)0.0168 (8)
O30.0462 (8)0.0451 (8)0.0327 (7)−0.0063 (6)−0.0078 (6)−0.0035 (6)
S10.0292 (2)0.0235 (2)0.0252 (2)0.00047 (14)0.00009 (14)0.00065 (14)
C1—N11.376 (2)C7—H7A0.95 (2)
C1—C61.397 (2)C7—H7B0.90 (2)
C1—C21.397 (2)C8—N21.491 (2)
C2—C31.379 (2)C8—C7i1.506 (3)
C2—H20.9300C8—H8B0.93 (2)
C3—C41.395 (2)C8—H8A0.98 (2)
C3—H30.9300N1—H1A0.82 (3)
C4—C51.389 (2)N1—H1B0.86 (3)
C4—S11.7614 (16)N2—H2B0.92 (3)
C5—C61.384 (2)N2—H2A0.85 (3)
C5—H50.9300O1—S11.4285 (14)
C6—H60.9300O2—S11.4548 (15)
C7—N21.486 (2)O3—S11.4553 (13)
C7—C8i1.506 (3)S1—O31.4553 (13)
N1—C1—C6120.59 (16)N2—C8—C7i110.69 (15)
N1—C1—C2121.04 (16)N2—C8—H8B107.1 (15)
C6—C1—C2118.37 (15)C7i—C8—H8B107.5 (15)
C3—C2—C1121.00 (15)N2—C8—H8A106.3 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.5C7i—C8—H8A112.6 (14)
C1—C2—H2119.5H8B—C8—H8A113 (2)
C2—C3—C4120.37 (15)C1—N1—H1A116.5 (16)
C2—C3—H3119.8C1—N1—H1B119.8 (16)
C4—C3—H3119.8H1A—N1—H1B123 (2)
C5—C4—C3118.95 (15)C7—N2—C8110.61 (14)
C5—C4—S1120.62 (12)C7—N2—H2B111.1 (15)
C3—C4—S1120.39 (12)C8—N2—H2B109.7 (15)
C6—C5—C4120.74 (15)C7—N2—H2A107.8 (16)
C6—C5—H5119.6C8—N2—H2A110.2 (16)
C4—C5—H5119.6H2B—N2—H2A107 (2)
C5—C6—C1120.56 (15)O1—S1—O2114.48 (12)
C5—C6—H6119.7O1—S1—O3113.06 (10)
C1—C6—H6119.7O2—S1—O3108.89 (10)
N2—C7—C8i110.17 (15)O1—S1—O3113.06 (10)
N2—C7—H7A105.4 (14)O2—S1—O3108.89 (10)
C8i—C7—H7A111.3 (14)O1—S1—C4106.80 (8)
N2—C7—H7B107.0 (14)O2—S1—C4105.87 (8)
C8i—C7—H7B112.6 (14)O3—S1—C4107.21 (8)
H7A—C7—H7B110.0 (19)O3—S1—C4107.21 (8)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.55 (16)O3—O3—S1—O10.00 (18)
C6—C1—C2—C30.2 (2)O3—O3—S1—O20.00 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.3 (3)O3—O3—S1—C40.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (2)C5—C4—S1—O1140.98 (15)
C2—C3—C4—S1177.43 (13)C3—C4—S1—O1−36.62 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C60.9 (2)C5—C4—S1—O218.58 (16)
S1—C4—C5—C6−176.76 (13)C3—C4—S1—O2−159.02 (14)
C4—C5—C6—C1−1.0 (3)C5—C4—S1—O3−97.55 (15)
N1—C1—C6—C5−178.90 (16)C3—C4—S1—O384.85 (15)
C2—C1—C6—C50.5 (2)C5—C4—S1—O3−97.55 (15)
C8i—C7—N2—C8−57.3 (2)C3—C4—S1—O384.85 (15)
C7i—C8—N2—C757.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2ii0.82 (3)2.27 (3)3.066 (2)164 (2)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.86 (3)2.49 (3)3.296 (3)156 (2)
N2—H2A···O30.85 (3)1.92 (3)2.764 (2)175 (2)
N2—H2B···O2iv0.92 (3)2.19 (2)2.928 (2)137 (2)
N2—H2B···O3iv0.92 (3)2.54 (2)3.328 (2)145 (2)
C7—H7A···O1v0.95 (2)2.50 (2)3.167 (2)128 (2)
C6—H6···Cg1iii0.932.923.753 (2)149
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2i 0.82 (3)2.27 (3)3.066 (2)164 (2)
N1—H1B⋯O1ii 0.86 (3)2.49 (3)3.296 (3)156 (2)
N2—H2A⋯O30.85 (3)1.92 (3)2.764 (2)175 (2)
N2—H2B⋯O2iii 0.92 (3)2.19 (2)2.928 (2)137 (2)
N2—H2B⋯O3iii 0.92 (3)2.54 (2)3.328 (2)145 (2)
C7—H7A⋯O1iv 0.95 (2)2.50 (2)3.167 (2)128 (2)
C6—H6⋯Cg1ii 0.932.923.753 (2)149

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  11 in total

1.  New quinoline derivatives: synthesis and investigation of antibacterial and antituberculosis properties.

Authors:  Sumesh Eswaran; Airody Vasudeva Adhikari; Imran H Chowdhury; Nishith K Pal; K D Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of new 5,6- (or 6,7-) disubstituted-2-(fluorophenyl)quinolin-4-one derivatives as potent antitumor agents.

Authors:  Li-Chen Chou; Meng-Tung Tsai; Mei-Hua Hsu; Sheng-Hung Wang; Tzong-Der Way; Chi-Hung Huang; Hui-Yi Lin; Keduo Qian; Yizhou Dong; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Li-Jiau Huang; Sheng-Chu Kuo
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  3-Aminomethyl derivatives of 4,11-dihydroxynaphtho[2,3-f]indole-5,10-dione for circumvention of anticancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Andrey E Shchekotikhin; Alexander A Shtil; Yuri N Luzikov; Tatyana V Bobrysheva; Vladimir N Buyanov; Maria N Preobrazhenskaya
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  New N-methylpiperazinyl derivatives of bicyclic antiprotozoal compounds.

Authors:  Johanna Faist; Werner Seebacher; Robert Saf; Reto Brun; Marcel Kaiser; Robert Weis
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Quinolines and structurally related heterocycles as antimalarials.

Authors:  Kirandeep Kaur; Meenakshi Jain; Ravi P Reddy; Rahul Jain
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Synthesis and anticancer evaluation of certain indolo[2,3-b]quinoline derivatives.

Authors:  Yeh-Long Chen; Hsien-Ming Hung; Chih-Ming Lu; Kuang-Chieh Li; Cherng-Chyi Tzeng
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of new 1-[3-(4-arylpiperazin-1-yl)-2-hydroxypropyl]-pyrrolidin-2-one derivatives with anti-arrhythmic, hypotensive, and alpha-adrenolytic activity.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kulig; Jacek Sapa; Dorota Maciag; Barbara Filipek; Barbara Malawska
Journal:  Arch Pharm (Weinheim)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.751

8.  Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro anti-microbial and anti-tubercular activity of 2-styryl benzimidazoles.

Authors:  Ramya V Shingalapur; Kallappa M Hosamani; Rangappa S Keri
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Piperazine-1,4-diium naphthalene-1,5-disulfonate.

Authors:  Bin Wei
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.