Literature DB >> 26870331

Comparison of the influence on renal function between cefepime and cefpirome.

Mingzi Jiang1, Jing Yao2, L I Zhang3, Tianming Gao2, Yang Zhang2, Xiaoqing Weng2, Ganzhu Feng2.   

Abstract

Although known for their broad spectrum and curative efficacy on drug-resistant pathogens and as nephrotoxicity-free, impairments were observed on renal function during clinical treatment of the two most commonly used fourth-generation cephalosporins: Cefpirome and cefepime. The present study aimed to further explore the exact influences of them on renal function. In vitro, the cell viability of renal cells cultured in drug-combined medium was tested for six dilutions. In vivo, a clinical cohort study was carried out to detect the influence of cefpirome and cefepime on the serum creatinine (SCr) level of patients. Cefpirome had an inhibition rate with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 143.5 µmol/l on renal mesangial cells, which was greater compared to the IC50 of 7.702 µmol/l for cefepime. The clinical cohort study data revealed that cefpirome treatment could lead to a greater increase of the average SCr level compared to cefepime on days 3 and 7 during therapy, and in addition, a greater incidence of SCr >445 µmol/l, an indicator of clinical renal failure. Furthermore, patients with an average age >65 years were observed as more susceptible to an SCr rise caused by either cefpirome or cefepime, with a larger augment in the average SCr, as well as a higher incidence of SCr >445 µmol/l compared to patients aged <65 years. In conclusion, cefpirome may have more potential to cause renal impairment compared to cefepime, therefore, more caution and comprehensive analysis of patient conditions is required during the clinical choice of fourth-generation cephalosporins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fourth-generation cephalosporins; renal function

Year:  2015        PMID: 26870331      PMCID: PMC4726849          DOI: 10.3892/br.2015.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Rep        ISSN: 2049-9434


  9 in total

1.  Do we need fourth-generation cephalosporins?

Authors:  I. M. Gould
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  [Nephrotoxicity of cefpirome sulfate in rabbits--single and multiple intravenous administration].

Authors:  T Deki; A Matsuoka; K Marutani; T Nakagawa; K Masuda; T Matsuzawa; K Horiuchi; T Ohishi; T Ohtani; R Niki
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.196

3.  Ceftriaxone ameliorates cyclosporine A-induced oxidative nephrotoxicity in rat.

Authors:  Nigar Yılmaz; Selçuk Ilhan; Mustafa Nazıroğlu; Süleyman Oktar; Ahmet Nacar; Vefik Arıca; Murat Tutanç
Journal:  Cell Biochem Funct       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 4.  Nephrotoxicity of beta-lactam antibiotics: mechanisms and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  B M Tune
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  The safety of cefepime and ceftazidime in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  James M Hoffman; Jamie Frediani; Michael Herr; Patricia M Flynn; Elisabeth E Adderson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Ceftriaxone-vancomycin drug toxicity reduction by VRP 1020 in Mus musculus mice.

Authors:  Arvind Soni; Manu Chaudhary; Vivek Kumar Dwivedi
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05

7.  Biochemical aspects of the renal tolerance for cefpirome and other cephalosporins.

Authors:  C Cojocel
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1990-10

8.  Transcriptomic analysis of nephrotoxicity induced by cephaloridine, a representative cephalosporin antibiotic.

Authors:  Masatomo Rokushima; Kae Fujisawa; Naoko Furukawa; Fumio Itoh; Toru Yanagimoto; Ryou Fukushima; Akiko Araki; Manabu Okada; Mikinori Torii; Ikuo Kato; Jun Ishizaki; Kazuo Omi
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 9.  Antibiotics in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of β-lactams.

Authors:  Joao Gonçalves-Pereira; Pedro Póvoa
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.