| Literature DB >> 26870122 |
Xigong Wang1, Zhengfu Zhang2, Jirong Pan3, Weizhong Zhang4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of embolic agents with different particle sizes on interventional treatment of uterine fibroids (UFs).Entities:
Keywords: Embolic agent; Ovarian function; Particle size; Quality of life; Uterine fibroid
Year: 2015 PMID: 26870122 PMCID: PMC4744307 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.316.7955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Baseline data.
| Index | Treatment group (n=65) | Control group (n=65) | χ2 or t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 41.83±4.92 | 41.78±5.00 | 0.153 | >0.05 |
| Disease course (year) | 3.76±1.08 | 3.72±1.00 | 0.221 | >0.05 |
| Uterine volume (cm3) | 290.78±14.88 | 291.73±16.33 | 0.045 | >0.05 |
| UF volume (cm3) | 114.87±13.00 | 116.37±12.63 | 0.183 | >0.05 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.38±2.61 | 22.41±3.09 | 0.089 | >0.05 |
Complications after intervention (n).
| Group | Case number (n) | Lower abdominal pain | Fever | Nausea and vomiting | Bleeding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 65 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 (10.8%) |
| Control group | 65 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 17 (26.2%) |
| χ2 | 8.553 | |||||
| P | <0.05 |
Uterine and UF volumes before and after intervention (cm3, x±s).
| Group | Case number (n) | Uterine volume | UF volume | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | Six months before | Before | Six months before | ||
| Treatment group | 65 | 290.78±14.88 | 168.24±12.87 | 114.87±13.00 | 23.94±9.44 |
| Control group | 65 | 291.73±16.33 | 123.76±13.99 | 116.37±12.63 | 44.73±10.67 |
| t | 0.045 | 14.998 | 0.183 | 19.334 | |
| P | >0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | |
Compared with the data before intervention,P<0.05.
FSH level changes before and after intervention (IU/L, x±s).
| Group | Case number (n) | Before | Six months before | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 65 | 9.99±4.38 | 10.09±4.33 | 0.453 | >0.05 |
| Control group | 65 | 10.10±3.89 | 10.66±5.21 | 0.500 | >0.05 |
| t | 0.145 | 0.398 | |||
| P | >0.05 | >0.05 |
Scores of quality of life.
| Group | Case number (n) | Physical function | Role-physical | Bodily pain | General health status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 65 | 55.38±5.33 | 48.98±6.37 | 56.92±5.09 | 57.11±6.02 |
| Control group | 65 | 55.37±4.02 | 48.77±6.20 | 57.00±5.22 | 57.28±6.22 |
| t | 0.008 | 0.056 | 0.067 | 0.055 | |
| P | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
| Treatment group | 65 | 83.47±6.44 | 84.78±7.03 | 84.29±6.00 | 85.92±5.11 |
| Control group | 65 | 74.93±5.09 | 78.46±6.00 | 75.99±5.30 | 71.63±6.31 |
| t | 6.983 | 4.983 | 6.449 | 8.444 | |
| P | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | |