| Literature DB >> 26869763 |
Lu Shan1, En-Xue Tao2, Qing-Hui Meng3, Wen-Xia Hou3, Kang Liu1, Hong-Cai Shang4, Jin-Bao Tang1, Wei-Fen Zhang5.
Abstract
Cholinergic neurotransmission loss is the main cause ofEntities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; chitosan; microsphere; phospholipids; spray drying
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26869763 PMCID: PMC4734723 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S97982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
The factors and levels discussed in the orthogonal design
| Levels | Factors
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tinlet (°C) | Feeding rate (mL/min) | Air flow rate (L/h) | CTS/PL/β-CD ratio | |
| 1 | 190 | 12 | 700 | 1:1:0.33 |
| 2 | 170 | 8 | 400 | 2:1:0.33 |
| 3 | 150 | 14 | 300 | 3:1:0.33 |
Abbreviations: Tinlet, inlet temperature; CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin.
Results of the orthogonal design
| Run number | A (°C) | B (mL/min) | C (L/h) | D | DL (%) | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 190 | 12 | 700 | 1/1/0.33 | 3.07±0.13 | 7.15±0.46 |
| 2 | 190 | 8 | 400 | 2/1/0.33 | 2.70±1.78 | 3.39±1.13 |
| 3 | 190 | 14 | 300 | 3/1/0.67 | 2.44±1.31 | 3.77±1.23 |
| 4 | 170 | 12 | 400 | 3/1/0.67 | 0.21±0.04 | 0.50±0.13 |
| 5 | 170 | 8 | 300 | 1/1/0.33 | 3.14±2.31 | 5.01±1.45 |
| 6 | 170 | 14 | 700 | 2/1/0.33 | 0.42±0.12 | 0.71±0.22 |
| 7 | 150 | 12 | 300 | 2/1/0.33 | 4.93±0.16 | 8.71±0.23 |
| 8 | 150 | 8 | 700 | 3/1/0.67 | 4.03±0.57 | 7.78±0.32 |
| 9 | 150 | 14 | 400 | 1/1/0.33 | 5.08±0.15 | 9.53±0.69 |
Notes: A, inlet temperature; B, feeding rate; C, air flow rate; and D, CTS/PL/β-CD ratio. Data in the “DL” and “EE” columns presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin; DL, drug loading; EE, encapsulation efficiency.
Figure 1The SEM of spray-drying microspheres.
Notes: The magnification is 3,000×. (A) 190°C, 12 mL/min, 700 L/h, 1:1:0.33; (B) 190°C, 8 mL/min, 400 L/h, 2:1:0.33; (C) 190°C, 14 mL/min, 300 L/h, 3:1:0.67; (D) 170°C, 12 mL/min, 400 L/h, 3:1:0.67; (E) 170°C, 8 mL/min, 300 L/h, 1:1:0.33 (F) 170°C, 14 mL/min, 700 L/h, 2:1:0.33; (G) 150°C, 12 mL/min, 300 L/h, 2:1:0.33; (H) 150°C, 8 mL/min, 700 L/h, 3:1:0.67; (I) 150°C, 14 mL/min, 400 L/h, 1:1:0.33; and (J) 150°C, 8 mL/min, 300 L/h, 1:1:0.33.
Abbreviation: SEM, scanning electron microscope.
Figure 2The FTIR spectra of (A) CTS, (B) PL, (C) CTS/PL MS, and (D) CTS/PL/β-CD MS.
Abbreviations: FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; MS, microspheres; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin.
Figure 3The DSC thermograms of (A) CTS/PL/β-CD microspheres, (B) CTS, (C) PL, and (D) PL/β-CD mixture.
Abbreviations: DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin.
Figure 4The moisture content of microspheres under different fabrication conditions.
Figure 5The swelling ratio of microspheres under different fabrication conditions.
Figure 6The tapped density of microspheres under different fabrication conditions.
Figure 7The moisture absorption rates of microspheres under different fabrication conditions.
Effects of microspheres on escape latency in rats
| Groups | Preoperative (t/s) | Postoperative 14 days (t/s) | Postoperative 30 days (t/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 21.04±5.75 | 17.45±5.47 | 11.78±2.66 |
| Model group | 20.99±2.86 | 40.92±3.83 | 37.98±7.14 |
| Low-dose group | 20.13±6.97 | 38.73±2.48 | 17.82±1.66 |
| Medium-dose group | 21.70±8.32 | 37.47±2.89 | 16.86±3.12 |
| High-dose group | 22.21±3.92 | 36.94±2.94 | 15.75±1.59 |
Notes:
P<0.01 versus control group;
P<0.01 versus model group. Data (mean ± SD, n=10) obtained after the same treatment day are significantly different.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; t/s, time/second.
Effects of microspheres on the numbers of crossings over the former location of the platform by rats
| Groups | Preoperative (time) | Postoperative 14 days (time) | Postoperative 30 days (time) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 4.10±0.66 | 4.80±0.63 | 4.65±0.58 |
| Model group | 4.20±0.54 | 1.10±0.21 | 1.30±0.48 |
| Low-dose group | 4.15±0.58 | 1.15±0.24 | 3.40±0.46 |
| Medium-dose group | 4.05±0.68 | 1.35±0.47 | 3.90±0.39 |
| High-dose group | 4.25±0.68 | 1.30±0.42 | 4.20±0.63 |
Notes:
P<0.01 versus control group;
P<0.01 versus model group. Data (mean ± SD, n=10) obtained after the same treatment day are significantly different.
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Figure 8Effects of CTS/PL/β-CD microspheres on the quantities of PKC-δ in the hippocampus by immunohistochemistry staining (light microscope, ×400).
Notes: (A) Control group, (B) high-dose group, (C) medium-dose group, (D) low-dose group, and (E) model group.
Abbreviations: CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin; PKC-δ, protein kinase C-δ.
Effects of microspheres on the expression of PKC-δ and Iba1
| Groups | PKC-δ | Iba1 |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | 15.0±3.68 | 16.2±3.32 |
| High-dose group | 25.9±3.17 | 33.0±5.20 |
| Medium-dose group | 30.9±3.69 | 39.4±4.25 |
| Low-dose group | 34.5±3.77 | 45.3±7.14 |
| Model group | 41.8±4.23 | 56.1±7.07 |
Notes:
P<0.05 versus model group;
P<0.05 versus model group. Data (mean ± SD, n=10) are obtained on the same day of treatment.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; PKC-δ, protein kinase C-δ; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1.
Figure 9Effects of CTS/PL/β-CD microspheres on the quantities of Iba1 in the hippocampus by immunohistochemistry staining (light microscope, ×400).
Notes: (A) Control group, (B) high-dose group, (C) medium-dose group, (D) low-dose group, and (E) model group.
Abbreviations: CTS, chitosan; PL, phospholipid; β-CD, β-cyclodextrin; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1.