Literature DB >> 26869500

Is it too early to move to full electronic PROM data collection?: A randomized controlled trial comparing PROM's after hallux valgus captured by e-mail, traditional mail and telephone.

Leonieke N Palmen1, Joost C M Schrier2, Ruben Scholten3, Justus H W Jansen3, Sander Koëter3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) after hallux valgus surgery are used to rate the effectiveness as perceived by the patient. The interpretability of these PROM's is highly dependent on participation rate. Data capture method may be an important factor contributing to the response rate. We investigated the effect on response rate of traditional paper mail, telephone and e-mail PROM's after hallux valgus surgery.
METHODS: All consecutive patients operated between January and September 2013, were identified. Included patients were randomized by envelope in three groups: traditional pen and paper mail, e-mail and telephone. They were asked to fill in a FFI and EQ-5D. Two weeks later non-responders were sent a reminder.
RESULTS: Of the 73 included patients, 25 were approached by mail, 24 by e-mail and 24 patients by telephone. The response rate on traditional mail was highest (88%), while response on e-mail was lowest (33%). Response rate on telephone was also high (79%). Response rate on traditional mail and telephone was significantly higher (p<0.001) than response on e-mail.
CONCLUSIONS: Though electronic data collection has enormous potential, this study shows that e-mail yields unacceptable low response rates. It is too early to replace traditional pen-and-paper PROM's by electronic questionnaires.
Copyright © 2015 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capture method; Hallux valgus; Outcome; PROM; Response

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26869500     DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1268-7731            Impact factor:   2.705


  9 in total

1.  Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Augustine C Lee; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; William F Harvey; Angie Mae Rodday; Chenchen Wang
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Karan Malhotra; Olatunbosun Buraimoh; James Thornton; Nicholas Cullen; Dishan Singh; Andrew J Goldberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Male Sex, Decreased Activity Level, and Higher BMI Associated With Lower Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric J Cotter; Charles P Hannon; Philip Locker; Annabelle Davey; Kevin C Wang; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-07

4.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; J M Blazeby; A Portal; R Harding; T Reed; T Lander; K A Chalmers; R Carter; R Singhal; K Absolom; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Investigating the Bias in Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures by Mode of Administration: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Acosta; Peter Tang; Steven Regal; Sam Akhavan; Alan Reynolds; Rebecca Schorr; Jon E Hammarstedt
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Protocol for implementation of the 'AusPROM' recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study.

Authors:  Meg E Morris; Natasha Brusco; Jeffrey Woods; Paul S Myles; Anita Hodge; Cathy Jones; Damien Lloyd; Vincent Rovtar; Amanda Clifford; Victoria Atkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Quantifying the effect email reminders have on patient reported outcome measure returns in a large prostate cancer registry.

Authors:  Nathan Papa; Jonathan G Bensley; Katrina Hall; Melanie Evans; Jeremy L Millar
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Digital medical history implementation to triage orthopaedic patients during COVID-19: Findings from a rapid cycle, semi-randomised A/B testing quality improvement project.

Authors:  David N Bernstein; Victor A van de Graaf; Irina Meijers; Anne Portengen; Amanda Klaassen; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman; Diederik H R Kempen
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2021-11-30

9.  Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vincent Maurice Meyer; Stan Benjamens; Mostafa El Moumni; Johan F M Lange; Robert A Pol
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.