Literature DB >> 26868992

Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening.

Zachary P Demko1, Alexander L Simon2, Rajiv C McCoy3, Dmitri A Petrov4, Matthew Rabinowitz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of maternal age on the average number of euploid embryos retrieved during oocyte harvest as part of an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, including the probability of retrieving at least one euploid embryo in a cohort (PrE).
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) laboratory. PATIENT(S): Women aged 18 to 48 years undergoing IVF treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Use of 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based PGS of day-3 and day-5 embryo biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Relationships between maternal age and the rate of embryos that tested as euploid (hereafter referred to as "euploid embryos"), the average number and proportion of euploid embryos per IVF cycle, and PrE. RESULT(S): We analyzed 22,599 day-3 embryos and 15,112 day-5 embryos. In women aged 27 to 35 years, the median proportion of euploid embryos in each cycle remained constant at ∼35% in day-3 biopsies and ∼55% in day-5 biopsies, but it decreased rapidly after age 35. On average, women in their late 20s had four euploid embryos (day 3 or day 5) per cycle, but this number decreased linearly (R(2) ≥ 0.983) after 35 years of age. The effect of maternal age on PrE was similar, with a rapid exponential decline (R(2) = 0.986). Across all maternal ages, the euploid proportion and number of embryos per cycle were counterbalanced, so the number of euploid embryos per cycle was the same for day-3 and day-5 biopsies. This suggests that the loss of embryos from day 3 to day 5 was primarily due to aneuploidy. CONCLUSION(S): Our results confirm the known inverse relationship between advanced maternal age (>35 years) and embryo euploidy, demonstrating that equal numbers of euploid embryos are available at day 3 and day 5.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; fertility; in vitro fertilization; maternal age; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868992     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  36 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases.

Authors:  Larysa Y Pylyp; Lyudmyla O Spynenko; Nataliya V Verhoglyad; Anna O Mishenko; Dmytro O Mykytenko; Valery D Zukin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Definition and Multiple Factors of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion.

Authors:  Xiaolin La; Wenjuan Wang; Meng Zhang; Li Liang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality.

Authors:  Stacy Colaco; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  T V Nikitina; E A Sazhenova; D I Zhigalina; E N Tolmacheva; N N Sukhanova; I N Lebedev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Prediction of a rare chromosomal aberration simultaneously with next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening in human preimplantation embryos for recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Yi-Xuan Lee; Chien-Wen Chen; Yi-Hui Lin; Chii-Ruey Tzeng; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Are blastocyst aneuploidy rates different between fertile and infertile populations?

Authors:  Jonathan D Kort; Rajiv C McCoy; Zach Demko; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins; Xiao Xu; Winifred Mak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Morphokinetic parameters from a time-lapse monitoring system cannot accurately predict the ploidy of embryos.

Authors:  Jingye Zhang; Wenrong Tao; Hui Liu; Guanling Yu; Mei Li; Shuiying Ma; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.