Literature DB >> 26868495

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Monica Verdoia1, Patrizia Pergolini2, Roberta Rolla2, Matteo Nardin1, Lucia Barbieri1, Veronica Daffara1, Paolo Marino1, Giorgio Bellomo2, Harry Suryapranata3, Giuseppe De Luca4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk is still underestimated in women, experiencing higher mortality and worse prognosis after acute cardiovascular events. Gender differences have been reported in thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), thus suggesting a potential variability in platelet reactivity according to sex. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of gender on platelet function and the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during DAPT in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary revascularization.
METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists).
RESULTS: We included 541 patients on DAPT, 122 (22.6 %) of whom were females. Females were older (p < 0.001), displayed more frequently hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003), renal failure (p = 0.04), acute presentation (p < 0.001), higher cholesterol levels and platelets count (p < 0.001). Inverse association was demonstrated with smoking (p < 0.001), previous PCI (p = 0.04) and statin use (p = 0.03), creatinine and haemoglobin (p < 0.001). Female gender did not influence mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR for ASA (1.7 % vs 1.4 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.14[0.17-4.36], p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.54[0.20-11.6], p = 0.68) or ADP-antagonists (26.3 % vs 22.8 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.52-1.34], p = 0.45, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.59-1.86], p = 0.87). Results did not change when considering separately the 309 patients treated with clopidogrel (34 % vs 31.3 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.13[0.62-2.07], p = 0.76, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.35[0.63-2.9], p = 0.44 for females vs males), or patients (n = 232) on ticagrelor (20.4 % vs 11.1 %, OR[95%CI] = 2.27[0.99-5.17], p = 0.06 for females vs males), confirmed after correction for baseline differences (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.28-2.29], p = 0.68).
CONCLUSION: In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, gender does not impact on the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) with the major antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clopidogrel; Coronary artery disease; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Gender; Platelet aggregation; Ticagrelor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868495     DOI: 10.1007/s10557-016-6646-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  6 in total

1.  Sex differences in flow cytometry-based platelet reactivity in stable outpatients suspected of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Farahnaz Waissi; Mirthe Dekker; Ingrid E M Bank; Suzanne J A Korporaal; Rolf T Urbanus; Gert J de Borst; Gerard Pasterkamp; Asbjorn M Scholtens; Diederick E Grobbee; Arend Mosterd; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Leo Timmers
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  Impact of gender on immature platelet count and its relationship with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Federica Negro; Monica Verdoia; Francesco Tonon; Matteo Nardin; Elvin Kedhi; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Gender differences with short-term vs 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with the COMBO dual therapy stent: 2-years follow-up results of the REDUCE trial.

Authors:  M Verdoia; H Suryapranata; S Damen; C Camaro; E Benit; L Barbieri; S Rasoul; H B Liew; J Polad; W A W Ahmad; R Zambahari; J Lalmand; R J van der Schaaf; T H Koh; P Timmermans; D Dilling-Boer; L F Veenstra; A W J Van't Hof; S W L Lee; V Roolvink; E Ligtenberg; S Postma; E J J Kolkman; M A Brouwer; E Kedhi; G De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pre-specified, Sex-Specific Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.

Authors:  Senta Gewalt; Shqipdona Lahu; Gjin Ndrepepa; Costanza Pellegrini; Isabell Bernlochner; Franz-Josef Neumann; Maurizio Menichelli; Tanja Morath; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Jochen Wöhrle; Katharina Hoppe; Gert Richardt; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Stefanie Schüpke; Katharina Mayer
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.394

Review 5.  Sex differences at the platelet-vascular interface.

Authors:  Annamaria Sabetta; Ludovica Lombardi; Lucia Stefanini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.472

6.  Factors related to on-treatment platelet aggregation assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry in percutaneous coronary intervention patients on clopidogrel and aspirin.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kukula; Mariusz Klopotowski; Joanna Was; Aleksandra Wrobel; Jacek Jamiolkowski; Artur Debski; Pawel Bekta; Zbigniew Chmielak; Adam Witkowski
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.