Literature DB >> 26868426

Comparison of a Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer Versus Plate-Cage Construct in the Treatment of Two Noncontiguous Levels of Cervical Spondylosis: A Preliminary Investigation.

Sheng Shi1, Shuang Zheng2, Xin-Feng Li1, Li-Li Yang3, Zu-De Liu4, Wen Yuan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The application of stand-alone anchored spacer (SAAS) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been proven to be safe and effective to treat cervical spondylosis. Skip-level ACDF with SAAS, fusing only the involved levels without anterior plates, may be the optimal treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes, radiologic results of SAAS, and plate-cage construct in the treatment of 2 noncontiguous levels of cervical spondylosis.
METHODS: A total of 65 patients with 2 noncontiguous levels of cervical spondylosis were included in the retrospective review of prospective collected data. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, cervical alignment, and range of motion and disc height of intermediate segment, respectively. All the aforementioned parameters were compared before and after surgery in the respective group, which also were compared between the 2 groups. Complications also were recorded, and correlations between the surgical outcome and various factors were analyzed.
RESULTS: No significant differences existed in clinical results between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In addition, no statistical significance was observed in fusion rate, cervical alignment, and range of motion and disc height of intermediate segment, dysphagia, and hoarseness (P > 0.05). Preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and high-intensity signal in T2-weighted images were important predictors for surgical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Skip-level ACDF with SAAS is a safe and effective treatment of 2 noncontiguous levels of cervical spondylosis without obvious contraindications, which can keep the IS intact, and have a low impact on the IS.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cervical spondylosis; Clinical feature; Intermediate segment; Stand-alone anchored spacer; Two noncontiguous levels

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868426     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

Review 1.  Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  ShanWen Xiao; ZhuDe Liang; Wu Wei; JinPei Ning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Fusion.

Authors:  Sheng Shi; Shuang Zheng; Xin-Feng Li; Li-Li Yang; Zu-De Liu; Wen Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of the clinical effects of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage-plate construct for the treatment of noncontiguous bilevel of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): A minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yingjie Lu; Weiguo Bao; Zongyi Wang; Feng Zhou; Jun Zou; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang; Zhiming Zhang; Xuesong Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Estrogen receptors involvement in intervertebral discogenic pain of the elderly women: colocalization and correlation with the expression of Substance P in nucleus pulposus.

Authors:  Xiao-Xing Song; Sheng Shi; Zhen Guo; Xin-Feng Li; Bu-Wei Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-13

5.  A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Bei-Yu Wang; Ming-Dan Deng; Ying Hong; Xin Rong; Hua Chen; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.