Literature DB >> 26868285

Receipt of Care Discordant with Practice Guidelines is Associated with Compromised Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Z G Schwam1, J A Sosa2, S Roman3, B L Judson4.   

Abstract

AIMS: It is unknown whether receiving treatment that is discordant with practice guidelines is associated with improved survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The objectives of this study were to characterise national treatment patterns, analyse whether treatment outside of practice guidelines is associated with overall survival, and identify variables associated with receiving guidelines-discordant care in the USA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1741 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2003-2006). Treatment regimens were compared with the 2004-2006 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Statistical analyses included chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression.
RESULTS: Nearly 26% of our cohort received care discordant with practice guidelines. In multivariable analysis, patients with stage IVC disease (odds ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.66-4.04) were more likely to receive guidelines-discordant care when compared with those with stage II-IVB disease. The most common treatment deviation for those with stage I disease was overtreatment with chemoradiation therapy. Receiving guidelines-discordant care was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.69).
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with stages I and IVC nasopharyngeal carcinoma do not receive care in accordance with practice guidelines. Receiving guidelines-discordant care is associated with compromised overall survival in the USA.
Copyright © 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; National Cancer Data Base; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; practice guideline

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868285     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  3 in total

1.  Clinical Molecular Marker Testing Data Capture to Promote Precision Medicine Research Within the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Natalia Udaltsova; Lawrence H Kushi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Pamala A Pawloski; Douglas A Corley; Sarah Knerr; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; David C Tabano; Mara M Epstein; Stacey A Honda; Monica Ter-Minassian; Julie A Lynch; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-09

2.  Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States.

Authors:  Leila T Tchelebi; Biyi Shen; Ming Wang; Louis Potters; Joseph Herman; Daniel Boffa; Joel E Segel; Henry S Park; Nicholas G Zaorsky
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Compliance with National Guidelines on the Treatment of Stage II–IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Regional Cancer Center of Southern China

Authors:  Jia-Xiang Ye; Xia Liang; Jian Wei; Jing Zhou; Yu Liao; Yu-Lei Lu; Xia-Quan Tang; An-Yu Wang; Yong Tang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-01-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.