Ping Jiang1, René Baumann2, Juergen Dunst3, Matthias Geenen4, Frank-André Siebert2, Peter Niehoff5, Julia Bertolini6, Daniel Druecke6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: ping.jiang@uksh.de. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Lubinus Clinic Kiel, Kiel, Germany. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Clinic Köln, Köln, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany. 6. Department of Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of therapy-resistant keloids and report first results, with emphasis on feasibility and early treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2014, 24 patients with 32 recurrent keloids were treated with immediate perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy; 3 patients had been previously treated with adjuvant external beam radiation therapy and presented with recurrences in the pretreated areas. Two or more different treatment modalities had been tried in all patients and had failed to achieve remission. After (re-)excision of the keloids, a single brachytherapy tube was placed subcutaneously before closing the wound. The target volume covered the scar in total length. Brachytherapy was given in 3 fractions with a single dose of 6 Gy in 5 mm tissue depth. The first fraction was given within 6 hours after surgery, the other 2 fractions on the first postoperative day. Thus, a total dose of 18 Gy in 3 fractions was administered within 36 hours after the resection. RESULTS: The treatment was feasible in all patients. No procedure-related complications (eg, secondary infections) occurred. Nineteen patients had keloid-related symptoms before treatment like pain and pruritus; disappearance of symptoms was noticed in all patients after treatment. After a median follow-up of 29.4 months (range, 7.9-72.4 months), 2 keloid recurrences and 2 mildly hypertrophied scars were observed. The local control rate was 94%. Pigmentary abnormalities were detected in 3 patients, and an additional 6 patients had a mild delay in the wound-healing process. CONCLUSIONS: The early results of this study prove the feasibility and the efficacy of brachytherapy for the prevention of keloids. The results also suggest that brachytherapy may be advantageous in the management of high-risk keloids or as salvage treatment for failure after external beam therapy.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of therapy-resistant keloids and report first results, with emphasis on feasibility and early treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2014, 24 patients with 32 recurrent keloids were treated with immediate perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy; 3 patients had been previously treated with adjuvant external beam radiation therapy and presented with recurrences in the pretreated areas. Two or more different treatment modalities had been tried in all patients and had failed to achieve remission. After (re-)excision of the keloids, a single brachytherapy tube was placed subcutaneously before closing the wound. The target volume covered the scar in total length. Brachytherapy was given in 3 fractions with a single dose of 6 Gy in 5 mm tissue depth. The first fraction was given within 6 hours after surgery, the other 2 fractions on the first postoperative day. Thus, a total dose of 18 Gy in 3 fractions was administered within 36 hours after the resection. RESULTS: The treatment was feasible in all patients. No procedure-related complications (eg, secondary infections) occurred. Nineteen patients had keloid-related symptoms before treatment like pain and pruritus; disappearance of symptoms was noticed in all patients after treatment. After a median follow-up of 29.4 months (range, 7.9-72.4 months), 2 keloid recurrences and 2 mildly hypertrophied scars were observed. The local control rate was 94%. Pigmentary abnormalities were detected in 3 patients, and an additional 6 patients had a mild delay in the wound-healing process. CONCLUSIONS: The early results of this study prove the feasibility and the efficacy of brachytherapy for the prevention of keloids. The results also suggest that brachytherapy may be advantageous in the management of high-risk keloids or as salvage treatment for failure after external beam therapy.
Authors: Luke R R Zawadiuk; Aaron C Van Slyke; Jeffrey Bone; Baillie Redfern; Nicholas J Carr; Jugpal S Arneja Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 0.947