| Literature DB >> 26867570 |
Yogesh Gawli1,2, Abhik Banerjee1, Dipti Dhakras1,2, Meenal Deo1, Dinesh Bulani3, Prakash Wadgaonkar1,2, Manjusha Shelke1,2, Satishchandra Ogale1,2,3.
Abstract
A good high rate supercapacitor performance requires a fine control of morphological (surface area and pore size distribution) and electrical properties of the electrode materials. Polyaniline (PANI) is an interesting material in supercapacitor context because it stores energy Faradaically. However in conventional inorganic (e.g. HCl) acid doping, the conductivity is high but the morphological features are undesirable. On the other hand, in weak organic acid (e.g. phytic acid) doping, interesting and desirable 3D connected morphological features are attained but the conductivity is poorer. Here the synergy of the positive quality factors of these two acid doping approaches is realized by concurrent and optimized strong-inorganic (HCl) and weak-organic (phytic) acid doping, resulting in a molecular composite material that renders impressive and robust supercapacitor performance. Thus, a nearly constant high specific capacitance of 350 F g(-1) is realized for the optimised case of binary doping over the entire range of 1 A g(-1) to 40 A g(-1) with stability of 500 cycles at 40 A g(-1). Frequency dependant conductivity measurements show that the optimized co-doped case is more metallic than separately doped materials. This transport property emanates from the unique 3D single molecular character of such system.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26867570 PMCID: PMC4751491 DOI: 10.1038/srep21002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 13D PANI Architecture by binary (weak and strong) acid doping (Yellow: Chlorine, Red: phytic acid, green: polymer chain).
Figure 2Scaning electron microscope images of all materials, Scale bar 5 μm: (a) PANI PA (b) PANI HCl (c) PANI 20PA (d) PANI 45PA (e) PANI 60PA (f) PANI 80PA.
Figure 3Transmission electron microscope images of (a) PANI HCl, (b) PANI PA, (c) PANI 45PA samples.
Figure 4(a) Adsorption Isotherms for the four materials of interest, (b) pore size distribution (inset zoom at lower pore width).
Figure 5(a) Discharge curves for all the samples of interest at 5 A g−1, (b) Discharge curves of the four samples at 40 A g−1, (c) Specific capacitance of the four samples at selected current densities, (d) Cycling stability of 4 selected samples at 40 A g−1.
Figure 6(a) Cyclic voltammetry of selected four samples depicting redox process, (b) Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) plots for the selected four materials, (c) IR drop variation as a function of current density, (d) Ragone plot.
Electrochemical Impedence Spectroscopy (EIS) parameters of four samples.
| Material | ESR (Ω) | Rct (mΩ) | Knee Frequency (Hz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANI HCl | 1.08 | 460 | 7.0 |
| PANI PA | 1.10 | 870 | 4.0 |
| PANI 45PA | 0.92 | 420 | 16.0 |
| PANI MIX | 1.32 | 1100 | 2.9 |
Figure 7frequency dependent conductivity data for the four samples of interest inset: Lower frequency.