John N Booth1, Paul Muntner, Marwah Abdalla, Keith M Diaz, Anthony J Viera, Kristi Reynolds, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo. 1. aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamabDepartment of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New YorkcDepartment of Family Medicine and Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North CarolinadDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CaliforniaeApplied Behavioral Medicine Research Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether defining diurnal periods by self-report, fixed-time, or actigraphy produce different estimates of night-time and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). METHODS: Over a median of 28 days, 330 participants completed two 24-h ABP and actigraphy monitoring periods with sleep diaries. Fixed night-time and daytime periods were defined as 0000-0600 h and 1000-2000 h, respectively. Using the first ABP period, within-individual differences for mean night-time and daytime ABP and kappa statistics for night-time and daytime hypertension (systolic/diastolic ABP≥120/70 mmHg and ≥135/85 mmHg, respectively) were estimated comparing self-report, fixed-time, or actigraphy for defining diurnal periods. Reproducibility of ABP was also estimated. RESULTS: Within-individual mean differences in night-time systolic ABP were small, suggesting little bias, when comparing the three approaches used to define diurnal periods. The distribution of differences, represented by 95% confidence intervals (CI), in night-time systolic and diastolic ABP and daytime systolic and diastolic ABP was narrowest for self-report versus actigraphy. For example, mean differences (95% CI) in night-time systolic ABP for self-report versus fixed-time was -0.53 (-6.61, +5.56) mmHg, self-report versus actigraphy was 0.91 (-3.61, +5.43) mmHg, and fixed-time versus actigraphy was 1.43 (-5.59, +8.46) mmHg. Agreement for night-time and daytime hypertension was highest for self-report versus actigraphy: kappa statistic (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.86,0.96) and 1.00 (0.98,1.00), respectively. The reproducibility of mean ABP and hypertension categories was similar using each approach. CONCLUSION: Given the high agreement with actigraphy, these data support using self-report to define diurnal periods on ABP monitoring. Further, the use of fixed-time periods may be a reasonable alternative approach.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether defining diurnal periods by self-report, fixed-time, or actigraphy produce different estimates of night-time and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). METHODS: Over a median of 28 days, 330 participants completed two 24-h ABP and actigraphy monitoring periods with sleep diaries. Fixed night-time and daytime periods were defined as 0000-0600 h and 1000-2000 h, respectively. Using the first ABP period, within-individual differences for mean night-time and daytime ABP and kappa statistics for night-time and daytime hypertension (systolic/diastolic ABP≥120/70 mmHg and ≥135/85 mmHg, respectively) were estimated comparing self-report, fixed-time, or actigraphy for defining diurnal periods. Reproducibility of ABP was also estimated. RESULTS: Within-individual mean differences in night-time systolic ABP were small, suggesting little bias, when comparing the three approaches used to define diurnal periods. The distribution of differences, represented by 95% confidence intervals (CI), in night-time systolic and diastolic ABP and daytime systolic and diastolic ABP was narrowest for self-report versus actigraphy. For example, mean differences (95% CI) in night-time systolic ABP for self-report versus fixed-time was -0.53 (-6.61, +5.56) mmHg, self-report versus actigraphy was 0.91 (-3.61, +5.43) mmHg, and fixed-time versus actigraphy was 1.43 (-5.59, +8.46) mmHg. Agreement for night-time and daytime hypertension was highest for self-report versus actigraphy: kappa statistic (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.86,0.96) and 1.00 (0.98,1.00), respectively. The reproducibility of mean ABP and hypertension categories was similar using each approach. CONCLUSION: Given the high agreement with actigraphy, these data support using self-report to define diurnal periods on ABP monitoring. Further, the use of fixed-time periods may be a reasonable alternative approach.
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-12-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: José Boggia; Yan Li; Lutgarde Thijs; Tine W Hansen; Masahiro Kikuya; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Tom Richart; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Lind; Hans Ibsen; Yutaka Imai; Jiguang Wang; Edgardo Sandoya; Eoin O'Brien; Jan A Staessen Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-10-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marissa A Bowman; Daniel J Buysse; Jillian E Foust; Vivianne Oyefusi; Martica H Hall Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: S Justin Thomas; John N Booth; Samantha G Bromfield; Samantha R Seals; Tanya M Spruill; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Srividya Kidambi; Daichi Shimbo; David Calhoun; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2017-02-16
Authors: Donald Edmondson; Jennifer A Sumner; Ian M Kronish; Matthew M Burg; Linda Oyesiku; Joseph E Schwartz Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Laura P Cohen; Joseph E Schwartz; Daniel N Pugliese; D Edmund Anstey; Jessica P Christian; Stephanie Jou; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo; Natalie A Bello Journal: Hypertension Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Samantha G Bromfield; John N Booth; Matthew S Loop; Joseph E Schwartz; Samantha R Seals; Stephen J Thomas; Yuan-I Min; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: John N Booth; D Edmund Anstey; Natalie A Bello; Byron C Jaeger; Daniel N Pugliese; Stephen Justin Thomas; Luqin Deng; James M Shikany; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Joseph E Schwartz; Cora E Lewis; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.738