Literature DB >> 26867038

Is spending money on others good for your heart?

Ashley V Whillans1, Elizabeth W Dunn1, Gillian M Sandstrom1, Sally S Dickerson2, Kenneth M Madden3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Does spending money on others (prosocial spending) improve the cardiovascular health of community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure?
METHOD: In Study 1, 186 older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure participating in the Midlife in the U.S. Study (MIDUS) were examined. In Study 2, 73 older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure were assigned to spend money on others or to spend money on themselves.
RESULTS: In Study 1, the more money people spent on others, the lower their blood pressure was 2 years later. In Study 2, participants who were assigned to spend money on others for 3 consecutive weeks subsequently exhibited lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to participants assigned to spend money on themselves. The magnitude of these effects was comparable to the effects of interventions such as antihypertensive medication or exercise.
CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings suggest that spending money on others shapes cardiovascular health, thereby providing a pathway by which prosocial behavior improves physical health among at-risk older adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26867038     DOI: 10.1037/hea0000332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  6 in total

1.  Individual differences in resting-state connectivity and giving social support: implications for health.

Authors:  Tristen K Inagaki; Meghan L Meyer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Altruistic behaviors relieve physical pain.

Authors:  Yilu Wang; Jianqiao Ge; Hanqi Zhang; Haixia Wang; Xiaofei Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Resilience and Social Support-Giving Scales: Conceptual and Empirical Validation.

Authors:  Louise Hawkley; Kristin Wroblewski; Kathleen A Cagney; Linda J Waite
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Cannabis consumption and prosociality.

Authors:  Jacob Miguel Vigil; Sarah S Stith; Tiphanie Chanel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Physical Activity and Sleep Improvements in a Group of Equestrian Therapy Volunteers: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Inés M Garcia-Peña; Andres García Gómez; Eloisa Guerrero-Barona; Juan M Moreno-Manso; Sabina Barrios-Fernandez
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  The balance of giving versus receiving social support and all-cause mortality in a US national sample.

Authors:  Edith Chen; Phoebe H Lam; Eric D Finegood; Nicholas A Turiano; Daniel K Mroczek; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.