Literature DB >> 26866702

CLINICAL AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DELIVERY WITH V-GO(®) DISPOSABLE INSULIN DELIVERY DEVICE VERSUS MULTIPLE DAILY INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON BASAL INSULIN.

Rosemarie Lajara, Jaime A Davidson, Carla C Nikkel, Tracy L Morris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods of delivering intensified insulin therapy (IIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin ± concomitant antihyperglycemic agents in a real-world clinical setting.
METHODS: Data for this retrospective study were obtained using electronic medical records from a large multicenter diabetes system. Records were queried to identify patients transitioned to V-Go(®) disposable insulin delivery device (V-Go) or multiple daily injections (MDI) using an insulin pen to add prandial insulin when A1C was >7% on basal insulin therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in A1C change using follow-up A1C results.
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were evaluated (56 V-Go, 60 MDI). Both groups experienced significant glycemic improvement from similar mean baselines. By 27 weeks, A1C least squares mean change from baseline was -1.98% (-21.6 mmol/mol) with V-Go and -1.34% (-14.6 mmol/mol) with MDI, for a treatment difference of -0.64% (-7.0 mmol/mol; P = .020). Patients using V-Go administered less mean ± SD insulin compared to patients using MDI, 56 ± 17 units/day versus 78 ± 40 units/day (P<.001), respectively. Diabetes-related direct pharmacy costs were lower with V-Go, and the cost inferential from baseline per 1% reduction in A1C was significantly less with V-Go ($118.84 ± $158.55 per patient/month compared to $217.16 ± $251.66 per patient/month with MDI; P = .013).
CONCLUSION: Progression to IIT resulted in significant glycemic improvement. Insulin delivery with V-Go was associated with a greater reduction in A1C, required less insulin, and proved more cost-effective than administering IIT with MDI. ABBREVIATIONS: A1C = glycated hemoglobin ANCOVA = analysis of covariance CI = confidence interval CSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion FPG = fasting plasma glucose IIT = intensified insulin therapy LSM = least squares mean MDI = multiple daily injections T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus TDD = total daily dose.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866702     DOI: 10.4158/EP151182.OR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pract        ISSN: 1530-891X            Impact factor:   3.443


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes With the V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lisa T Meade; Dawn Battise
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-07

2.  A Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Compare the Real-World Effectiveness of V-Go versus Standard Delivery of Insulin in Patients with Advanced Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Mark J Cziraky; Scott Abbott; Matt Nguyen; Kay Larholt; Elizabeth Apgar; Thomas Wasser; Poul Strange; Leon Shi; H Courtenay Harrison; Beverly Everitt; Lynn Nowak
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-03-27

3.  Cost-effectiveness of Simple Insulin Infusion Devices Compared to Multiple Daily Injections in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetics in the United States Based on a Simulation Model.

Authors:  Peter Wahlqvist; Jay Warner; Robert Morlock
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-08-22

4.  Multicenter Real-World Assessment of the Effectiveness of V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (ENABLE Study): A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Ripu Hundal; Stephan Kowalyk; Amanda Wakim; Carla Nikkel; John H Sink Ii; Melissa Doyle
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  Treatment Intensification With Insulin Pumps and Other Technologies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Results of a Physician Survey in the United States.

Authors:  George Grunberger; David Sze; Anastasia Ermakova; Ray Sieradzan; Teresa Oliveria; Eden M Miller
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-01

6.  Key Features of Insulin Delivery Devices for Type 2 Diabetes: Type 2.0 Booth Survey.

Authors:  David Sze; Teresa Oliveria
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-01

7.  The Clinical and Economic Impact of the V-Go® Disposable Insulin Delivery Device for Insulin Delivery in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes at High Risk.

Authors:  Rosemarie Lajara; Carla Nikkel; Scott Abbott
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-06-02

8.  Safety and Effectiveness of an Investigational Insulin Delivery Device Providing Basal/Bolus Therapy with Rapid-Acting or Regular Human Insulin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ronnie Aronson; Edward Mahoney; Drilon Saliu; David Sze; Didier Morel; Leya Bergquist; Laurence Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Clinical Benefits Over Time Associated with Use of V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device in Adult Patients with Diabetes: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  David Sutton; Charissa D Higdon; Carla Nikkel; Karrie A Hilsinger
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness comparison between U-100 human regular insulin and rapid acting insulin when delivered by V-Go wearable insulin delivery device in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Pablo F Mora; David R Sutton; Ashwini Gore; Bantwal Baliga; Rebecca F Goldfaden; Carla Nikkel; John Sink Ii; Beverley Adams-Huet
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.