Literature DB >> 26866549

Socio-demographic and structural barriers to being tested for chlamydia in general practice.

Andrew Lau1, Simone Spark2, Jane Tomnay3, Meredith T Smith4, Christopher K Fairley5, Rebecca J Guy6, Basil Donovan4, Jane S Hocking4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate socio-demographic and structural factors associated with not providing a specimen for chlamydia testing following a request by a general practitioner. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of chlamydia testing data for men and women aged 16-29 years attending general practice clinics participating in a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a chlamydia testing intervention. The study period was the 2013 calendar year. OUTCOME: The proportion of chlamydia test requests for which the patient did not provide a specimen for testing.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 13 225 chlamydia test requests, for which a chlamydia test was not performed in 2545 instances (19.2%; 95% CI, 16.5-22.3%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the odds for not undertaking a requested test were higher for men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), those aged 16-19 years (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), those living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4 for each additional quintile of Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage), and those attending clinics without on-site pathology collection (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9).
CONCLUSION: One in five young people did not submit a specimen for chlamydia testing despite their GP requesting it. This highlights the need for clinics to establish systems which ensure that men and those aged 16-19 years undertake chlamydia tests requested by a GP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866549     DOI: 10.5694/mja15.00933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Exploring psychosocial predictors of STI testing in University students.

Authors:  H A Martin-Smith; E A Okpo; E R Bull
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Mixed effects analysis of factors associated with barriers to accessing healthcare among women in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from demographic and health surveys.

Authors:  Abdul-Aziz Seidu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Barriers to accessing healthcare among women in Ghana: a multilevel modelling.

Authors:  Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Eugene Kofuor Maafo Darteh; Ebenezer Agbaglo; Louis Kobina Dadzie; Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Justice Kanor Tetteh; Linus Baatiema; Sanni Yaya
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore; Gregory Traversy; Donna L Reynolds; John J Riva; Guylène Thériault; Brenda J Wilson; Melissa Subnath; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Individual and contextual factors associated with barriers to accessing healthcare among women in Papua New Guinea: insights from a nationwide demographic and health survey.

Authors:  Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Ebenezer Agbaglo; Louis Kobina Dadzie; Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Justice Kanor Tetteh
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  The Association between the Australian Alcopops Tax and National Chlamydia Rates among Young People-an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  William Gilmore; Tanya Chikritzhs; Hamish McManus; John Kaldor; Rebecca Guy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.