Obinna Achuko1, Rebekah J Walker1,2,3, Jennifer A Campbell1, Aprill Z Dawson1, Leonard E Egede1,2,3. 1. 1 Center for Health Disparities Research, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina. 2. 2 Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Charleston VA Health Services Research and Development COIN, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center , Charleston, South Carolina. 3. 3 Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discrimination is a social determinant that has been linked to poor physical and mental health outcomes. This study aimed to examine the pathway whereby discrimination influences quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six hundred fifteen patients were recruited from two adult primary care clinics in the southeastern United States. Measures included perceived discrimination, perceived stress, social support, and social cohesion and were based on a theoretical model for the pathways by which perceived discrimination influences mental and physical health. Quality of life was measured using the SF-12 questionnaire. RESULTS: The final model [χ(2)(106) = 157.35, P = 0.009, R(2) = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.03, comparative fit index = 0.99] indicates direct effects of higher perceived stress (r = -1.02, P < 0.05) and lower social support (r = 0.36, P < 0.001) significantly related to decreased mental health component score (MCS) of quality of life. Discrimination and social cohesion were not significantly directly related to MCS. However, higher discrimination (r = 0.47, P < 0.001), higher social cohesion (r = 0.14, P < 0.05), and lower social support (r = -0.43, P < 0.001) were significantly directly related to increased stress. No significant paths were found for the physical component score of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived discrimination was significantly associated with stress and served as a pathway to influence the mental health component of quality of life (MCS). Social support had a direct and an indirect effect on MCS through a negative association with stress. These results suggest that future interventions should be developed to decrease stress and increase social support surrounding discrimination to improve the MCS of quality of life in patients with diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Discrimination is a social determinant that has been linked to poor physical and mental health outcomes. This study aimed to examine the pathway whereby discrimination influences quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six hundred fifteen patients were recruited from two adult primary care clinics in the southeastern United States. Measures included perceived discrimination, perceived stress, social support, and social cohesion and were based on a theoretical model for the pathways by which perceived discrimination influences mental and physical health. Quality of life was measured using the SF-12 questionnaire. RESULTS: The final model [χ(2)(106) = 157.35, P = 0.009, R(2) = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.03, comparative fit index = 0.99] indicates direct effects of higher perceived stress (r = -1.02, P < 0.05) and lower social support (r = 0.36, P < 0.001) significantly related to decreased mental health component score (MCS) of quality of life. Discrimination and social cohesion were not significantly directly related to MCS. However, higher discrimination (r = 0.47, P < 0.001), higher social cohesion (r = 0.14, P < 0.05), and lower social support (r = -0.43, P < 0.001) were significantly directly related to increased stress. No significant paths were found for the physical component score of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived discrimination was significantly associated with stress and served as a pathway to influence the mental health component of quality of life (MCS). Social support had a direct and an indirect effect on MCS through a negative association with stress. These results suggest that future interventions should be developed to decrease stress and increase social support surrounding discrimination to improve the MCS of quality of life in patients with diabetes.
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; Joseph M Rifkind; Joy G Mohanty; Edgar R Miller; Roland J Thorpe; Eneka Nagababu; Elissa S Epel; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Anne Eacker; William Harper; F Stanford Massie; David V Power; Mashele Huschka; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-10-22
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Brittany L Smalls; Jennifer A Campbell; Joni L Strom Williams; Leonard E Egede Journal: Endocrine Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Jeannette O Andrews; Martina Mueller; Susan D Newman; Gayenell Magwood; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Kellee White; Martha S Tingen Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Jennifer A Campbell; Alice Yan; Renee E Walker; Lance Weinhardt; Yang Wang; Rebekah J Walker; Leonard E Egede Journal: Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care Date: 2021-02-28
Authors: David M Cykert; Joni S Williams; Rebekah J Walker; Kimberly S Davis; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 2.852