Literature DB >> 26866293

Generalizability of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic Agent Clinical Trials.

Priyanka Vashisht1, Harlan Sayles1, Amy C Cannella1, Ted R Mikuls1, Kaleb Michaud2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of biologic agents in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who satisfy strict eligibility criteria, yet studies report that a majority of RA patients in the US have had biologic treatment exposure. We identified the proportion of RA patients in clinical practice satisfying entry criteria for biologic agent RCTs.
METHODS: Eligibility criteria of 30 RCTs of 10 Food and Drug Administration-approved biologic agents to treat RA were reviewed, summarized, and applied to 2 observational clinical cohorts: the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis registry (VARA; n = 1,523) and the Rheumatology and Arthritis Investigational Network Database (RAIN-DB; n = 1,548). Patients at a single clinical encounter were assessed for overall trial eligibility as well as eligibility across 3 domains: demographics, disease activity, and medication exposure.
RESULTS: The mean percentage of patients that satisfied eligibility criteria was 3.7% (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-3.1) in VARA and 7.1% (IQR 4.4-7.7) in RAIN-DB. Ineligibility was most often due to low disease activity, specifically low joint counts. The mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints at enrollment was 6.59 (range 6.1-7.1) across RCTs versus 3.87 (0.07-8.69) in VARA and 3.65 (0.49-7.21) in RAIN-DB. RCTs for non-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor biologic agents were more restrictive than RCTs for TNF inhibitors. There was no trend in eligibility by RCT study publication or drug approval date.
CONCLUSION: The vast majority of RA patients from our clinical cohorts did not satisfy criteria for participation in biologic agent RCTs. These findings underscore the need for caution in extrapolating trial results to day-to-day management of RA patients and may provide insight into the differential responses to biologic agents reported in prior observational studies.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866293     DOI: 10.1002/acr.22860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Changing Face of Clinical Trials in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Alexis Ogdie; Laura Coates
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  [New options for the practice : Update S1/S2 guidelines on rheumatoid arthritis?]

Authors:  M Schneider
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  The persistence of golimumab compared to other tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in daily clinical practice for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: observations from the Slovenian nation-wide longitudinal registry of patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-BioRx.si.

Authors:  Žiga Rotar; Matija Tomšič; Sonja Praprotnik
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Tools and Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation: Pragmatic Trials, Electronic Consent, and Data Linkages.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; P Jeff Foster; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  The Incidence, Prevalence, and Associated Costs of Anemia, Malignancy, Venous Thromboembolism, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, and Infections in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients by Treatment History in the United States.

Authors:  Robin K Dore; Jenya N Antonova; Chakkarin Burudpakdee; Lawrence Chang; Magdaliz Gorritz; Mark C Genovese
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  Does intensive management improve remission rates in patients with intermediate rheumatoid arthritis? (the TITRATE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Naomi H Martin; Fowzia Ibrahim; Brian Tom; James Galloway; Allan Wailoo; Jonathan Tosh; Heidi Lempp; Louise Prothero; Sofia Georgopoulou; Jackie Sturt; David L Scott
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  SLE: reconciling heterogeneity.

Authors:  Michael D Lockshin; Medha Barbhaiya; Peter Izmirly; Jill P Buyon; Mary K Crow
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Patients with psoriatic arthritis who are not eligible for randomised controlled trials for TNF inhibitors have treatment response and drug survival similar to those who are eligible.

Authors:  Olafur Palsson; Thorvardur Jon Love; Anna Ingibjorg Gunnarsdottir; Petur Sigurdur Gunnarsson; Eydis Erla Runarsdottir; Niels Steen Krogh; Bjorn Gudbjornsson
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-07-16

9.  The Use of Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index for Predicting Clinical Response and Retention Rate in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors.

Authors:  Martina Biggioggero; Federica Mesina; Ennio Giulio Favalli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A Mobile App With Optical Imaging for the Self-Management of Hand Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mollard; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.