| Literature DB >> 26866008 |
Mohammed Elshiekh1, Mehri Kadkhodaee2, Behjat Seifi2, Mina Ranjbaran2, Parisa Ahghari3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury is one of the most common causes of renal dysfunction. There is increasing evidence about the role of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in these injuries and endogenous antioxidants seem to have an important role in decreasing the renal tissue injury.Entities:
Keywords: Erythropoietin; Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury; Ischemic Preconditioning; Oxidative Stress; Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury
Year: 2015 PMID: 26866008 PMCID: PMC4744640 DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.31152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephrourol Mon ISSN: 2251-7006
Figure 1.Experimental Protocols
Figure 2.Effects of Erythropoietin (EPO) and Ischemic Preconditioning (IPC) on (A) Plasma BUN and (B) Plasma Creatinine
The sham group did not undergo any further interventions; the ischemia/reperfusion (IR) group was subjected to 50 minutes bilateral ischemia followed by 24 hours reperfusion. A single dose of EPO (5000 U/kg, i.p) was administered 30 minutes prior to ischemia. Ischemic preconditioning consisted of three cycles of 3 minutes intermittent IR of renal pedicles applied at the beginning of the 50 minutes period of renal ischemia, followed by 24 hours reperfusion. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 6 to 9). *P < 0.05 compared to the sham group; #P < 0.05 compared to the IR group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Figure 3.Effects of Erythropoietin (EPO) and Ischemic Preconditioning (IPC) on (A) Malondialdehyde (MDA) Content, (B) Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity and (C) Reduced Glutathione (GSH) Levels
The sham group did not undergo any further interventions; the ischemia/reperfusion (IR) group was subjected to 50 minutes bilateral ischemia followed by 24 hours reperfusion. A single dose of EPO (5000 U/kg, i.p) was administered 30 minutes prior to ischemia. Ischemic preconditioning consisted of three cycles of 3 minutes intermittent IR of renal pedicles applied at the beginning of the 50 minutes period of renal ischemia, followed by 24 hours reperfusion. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 6 to 9). *P < 0.05 compared to the sham group; #P < 0.05 compared to the IR group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Biochemical and Oxidative Stress Indices Measurements[a]
| Biochemical and Oxidative Stress Indices | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | IR | EPO | IPC | |
|
| 22.50 ± 3.18 | 133.33 ± 5.48[ | 64.33 ± 8.75 | 68.60 ± 5.87 |
|
| 0.29 ± 0.08 | 2.75 ± 0.40[ | 1.26 ± 0.36[ | 1.28 ± 0.14[ |
|
| 1.20 ± 0.09 | 2.13 ± 0.14[ | 1.56 ± 0.1[ | 1.54 ± 0.07[ |
|
| 29.84 ± 2.78 | 9.04 ± 1.44[ | 22.37 ± 2.34[ | 21.48 ± 3.22[ |
|
| 79.63 ± 3.5 | 26.02 ± 4.36[ | 67.69 ± 4.48[ | 64.74 ± 3.42[ |
Abbreviations: IR, ischemia/reperfusion; EPO, erythropoietin; IPC, ischemic preconditioning; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; sCr, serum creatinine; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, glutathione.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean.
bP < 0.05 compared to the sham group.
cP < 0.05 compared to the IR group.