Literature DB >> 2686577

Linkage studies of bipolar disorder: methodologic and analytic issues. Report of MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Linkage and Clinical Features in Affective Disorders.

K R Merikangas1, M A Spence, D J Kupfer.   

Abstract

To review the findings of the linkage studies of affective disorders, a workshop, "Linkage and Clinical Features in Affective Disorders," was organized by the MacArthur Foundation Mental Health Research Network I on the Psychobiology of Depression meeting in Alexandria, Va, April 13 to 15, 1989. The major goals of the workshop for affective disorders were to explore the relationship between genetic and clinical heterogeneity, to identify major impediments to linkage studies, and to develop recommendations for the application of standardized methods of conducting linkage studies. The participants in the conference presented detailed demographic and clinical data from most of the published linkage studies of affective disorders. No systematic correspondence between genetic and clinical subtypes of bipolar disorder pedigrees was evident. The major problems hampering the linkage analyses of psychiatric disorders that were identified follow: (1) the major psychiatric disorders--the affective disorders in particular--constituting complex human disorders; (2) the lack of valid definitions of affective disorders; (3) comorbidity between the affective disorders with other disorders; (4) nonrandom mating; (5) a cohort effect, with younger birth cohorts exhibiting higher rates of affective disorders; and (6) the lack of replication of current linkage studies. The recommendations that were made for linkage study designs that incorporate some of the complexities of the affective disorders are reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686577     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810120079012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  8 in total

1.  Inter- and intrafamilial heterogeneity: effective sampling strategies and comparison of analysis methods.

Authors:  M Durner; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Approaches to unravel the genetics of sleep.

Authors:  Mikhil N Bamne; Hader Mansour; Timothy H Monk; Daniel J Buysse; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 11.609

Review 3.  Current perspectives on the genetics of unipolar depression.

Authors:  S O Moldin; T Reich; J P Rice
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.

Authors:  N J Schork; M Boehnke; J D Terwilliger; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The reliability of the SADS-LA in a family study setting.

Authors:  M Leboyer; W Maier; M Teherani; D Lichtermann; T D'Amato; P Franke; J P Lépine; J Minges; P McGuffin
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 6.  Identification of the phenotype in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  M T Tsuang; S V Faraone; M J Lyons
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Comparing family-based rare variant association tests for dichotomous phenotypes.

Authors:  Longfei Wang; Sungkyoung Choi; Sungyoung Lee; Taesung Park; Sungho Won
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2016-10-18

Review 8.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Susan M Sirmans; Kristen A Pate
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.