Literature DB >> 2686575

Relevance of DMS-III depressive subtype and chronicity of antidepressant efficacy in atypical depression. Differential response to phenelzine, imipramine, and placebo.

J W Stewart1, P J McGrath, F M Quitkin, W Harrison, J Markowitz, S Wager, M R Leibowitz.   

Abstract

One hundred ninety-four nonmelancholic depressed outpatients with features of atypical depression took part in a 6-week randomized trial of imipramine hydrochloride, phenelzine sulfate, and placebo. Their courses of illness were also rated for chronicity. Significantly more patients responded to phenelzine (71%) than to imipramine (48%), which benefited significantly more patients than placebo (26%). Both chronicity and DMS-III diagnosis predicted response on several outcome measures. For example, patients with dysthymic disorder responded better to treatment than did those with major depression, suggesting that dysthymic disorder can be treated with medication. Placebo response correlated inversely with chronicity, regardless of DMS-III diagnosis. Atypical depression and longitudinal course of illness may add to the usefulness of DMS-III depressive diagnosis as a predictor of antidepressant response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686575     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810120022005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  9 in total

1.  Epidemiology of major depression with atypical features: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

Authors:  Carlos Blanco; Oriana Vesga-López; Jonathan W Stewart; Shang-Min Liu; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  The state of knowledge of chronic depression.

Authors:  Alan J Gelenberg; James H Kocsis; James P McCullough; Philip T Ninan; Michael E Thase
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006

3.  Pretreatment and early-treatment cortical thickness is associated with SSRI treatment response in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bartlett; Christine DeLorenzo; Priya Sharma; Jie Yang; Mengru Zhang; Eva Petkova; Myrna Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; R Todd Ogden; Benji T Kurian; Ashley Malchow; Crystal M Cooper; Joseph M Trombello; Melvin McInnis; Phillip Adams; Maria A Oquendo; Diego A Pizzagalli; Madhukar Trivedi; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Placebo: a potent but misunderstood psychotrope.

Authors:  Y D Lapierre
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  A comparison of placebo responders and nonresponders in subgroups of depressive disorder.

Authors:  R J Bialik; A V Ravindran; D Bakish; Y D Lapierre
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 6.  A comparison of active drugs for the treatment of dysthymia.

Authors:  M Silva de Lima; M Hotopf
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Benefits and risks of pharmacotherapy for dysthymia: a systematic appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Maurício S De Lima; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): Rationale and design.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Ramin V Parsey; Benji T Kurian; Mary L Phillips; Maria A Oquendo; Gerard Bruder; Diego Pizzagalli; Marisa Toups; Crystal Cooper; Phil Adams; Sarah Weyandt; David W Morris; Bruce D Grannemann; R Todd Ogden; Randy Buckner; Melvin McInnis; Helena C Kraemer; Eva Petkova; Thomas J Carmody; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  The early course of atypical depression.

Authors:  D Ebert; A Barocka
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.