Jack Bartram1, Rachel Wade2, Ajay Vora3, Jeremy Hancock4, Chris Mitchell5, Sally Kinsey6, Colin Steward7, John Moppett7, Nick Goulden1. 1. Department of Haematology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK. 2. Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Haematology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK. 4. Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. 5. Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. 6. Department of Paediatric Haematology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK. 7. Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of sub-microscopic levels of leukaemia. Measurement of MRD from bone marrow at the end of induction chemotherapy (day 28) for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) can highlight a large group of patients (>40%) with an excellent (>90%) short-term event-free survival (EFS). However, follow-up in recent published trials is relatively short, raising concerns about using this result to infer the safety of further therapy reduction in the future. METHODS: We examined MRD data on 225 patients treated on one of three UKALL trials between 1997 and 2003 to assess the long-term (>10 years follow-up) outcome of those patients who had low-risk MRD (<0.01%) at day 28. RESULTS: Our pilot data define a cohort of 53% of children with MRD <0.01% at day 28 who have an EFS of 91% and long-term overall survival of 97%. Of 120 patients with day-28 MRD <0.01% and extended follow-up, there was one death due to treatment-related toxicity, one infectious death while in complete remission, and four relapse deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent outcome for childhood ALL in patients with MRD <0.01% after induction chemotherapy is sustained for more than 10 years from diagnosis. This supports the potential exploration of further reduction of therapy in this group, in an attempt to reduce treatment-related mortality and late effects. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of sub-microscopic levels of leukaemia. Measurement of MRD from bone marrow at the end of induction chemotherapy (day 28) for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) can highlight a large group of patients (>40%) with an excellent (>90%) short-term event-free survival (EFS). However, follow-up in recent published trials is relatively short, raising concerns about using this result to infer the safety of further therapy reduction in the future. METHODS: We examined MRD data on 225 patients treated on one of three UKALL trials between 1997 and 2003 to assess the long-term (>10 years follow-up) outcome of those patients who had low-risk MRD (<0.01%) at day 28. RESULTS: Our pilot data define a cohort of 53% of children with MRD <0.01% at day 28 who have an EFS of 91% and long-term overall survival of 97%. Of 120 patients with day-28 MRD <0.01% and extended follow-up, there was one death due to treatment-related toxicity, one infectious death while in complete remission, and four relapse deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent outcome for childhood ALL in patients with MRD <0.01% after induction chemotherapy is sustained for more than 10 years from diagnosis. This supports the potential exploration of further reduction of therapy in this group, in an attempt to reduce treatment-related mortality and late effects. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
Haematology; Molecular Biology; Oncology; Outcomes research; Paediatric Practice
Authors: Kelly W Maloney; Meenakshi Devidas; Cindy Wang; Leonard A Mattano; Alison M Friedmann; Patrick Buckley; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Nyla A Heerema; Nina Kadan-Lottick; Mignon L Loh; Yousif H Matloub; David T Marshall; Linda C Stork; Elizabeth A Raetz; Brent Wood; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll; Naomi J Winick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alissa W Zhang; John T Wiernikowski; Carol Portwine; Lehana Thabane; M Constantine Samaan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: C-H Pui; D Pei; S C Raimondi; E Coustan-Smith; S Jeha; C Cheng; W P Bowman; J T Sandlund; R C Ribeiro; J E Rubnitz; H Inaba; T A Gruber; W H Leung; J J Yang; J R Downing; W E Evans; M V Relling; D Campana Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: David O'Connor; Amir Enshaei; Jack Bartram; Jeremy Hancock; Christine J Harrison; Rachael Hough; Sujith Samarasinghe; Claire Schwab; Ajay Vora; Rachel Wade; John Moppett; Anthony V Moorman; Nick Goulden Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vinod Vijay Subhash; Libby Huang; Alvin Kamili; Marie Wong; Dan Chen; Nicola C Venn; Caroline Atkinson; Chelsea Mayoh; Pooja Venkat; Vanessa Tyrrell; Glenn M Marshall; Mark J Cowley; Paul G Ekert; Murray D Norris; Michelle Haber; Michelle J Henderson; Rosemary Sutton; Jamie I Fletcher; Toby N Trahair Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 7.640