Literature DB >> 26865650

Breakfast-Skipping and Selecting Low-Nutritional-Quality Foods for Breakfast Are Common among Low-Income Urban Children, Regardless of Food Security Status.

Holly Dykstra1, Adam Davey1, Jennifer O Fisher2, Heather Polonsky3, Sandra Sherman4, Michelle L Abel4, Lauren C Dale4, Gary D Foster5, Katherine W Bauer6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Universal access to the School Breakfast Program (SBP) is intended to help low-income and food-insecure students overcome barriers to eating breakfast. However, SBP participation is often still low despite universal access. Further information is needed with regard to these children's breakfast behaviors, and in particular breakfast behaviors among youth from food-insecure families, to inform effective breakfast interventions.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine breakfast behaviors among a large sample of urban students with universal access to the SBP and to identify differences in breakfast behaviors among children from food-secure compared with food-insecure households.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 821 fourth- through sixth-grade students and their parents from 16 schools was conducted. Students reported the foods/drinks selected and location of obtaining food/drink on the morning of data collection, parents reported household food security status using the 6-item Food Security Survey Module, and the school district provided SBP participation data during the fall semester of 2013. Multivariable linear regression models accounting for school-level clustering were used to examine differences in breakfast behaviors across 3 levels of household food security: food secure, low food secure, and very low food secure.
RESULTS: Students participated in the SBP 31.2% of possible days, with 13% never participating in the SBP. One-fifth (19.4%) of students purchased something from a corner store for breakfast, and 16.9% skipped breakfast. Forty-six percent of students were food insecure; few differences in breakfast behaviors were observed across levels of food security.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite universal access to the SBP, participation in the SBP is low. Breakfast skipping and selection of foods of low nutritional quality in the morning are common, regardless of household food security status. Additional novel implementation of the SBP and addressing students' breakfast preferences may be necessary to further reduce barriers to students obtaining a free, healthful breakfast. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01924130.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  School Breakfast Program; breakfast; children; dietary intake; food insecurity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26865650     DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.225516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  11 in total

1.  Simulated Models Suggest That Price per Calorie Is the Dominant Price Metric That Low-Income Individuals Use for Food Decision Making.

Authors:  Rahmatollah Beheshti; Takeru Igusa; Jessica Jones-Smith
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  School Breakfast Program Participation and Rural Adolescents' Purchasing Behaviors in Food Stores and Restaurants.

Authors:  Caitlin Eicher Caspi; Qi Wang; Amy Shanafelt; Nicole Larson; Susan Wei; Mary O Hearst; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.118

3.  Dietary intakes of adolescents from food insecure households: analysis of data from the 6th (2013-2015) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Mariam Nakitto; Kana Asano; Injoo Choi; Jihyun Yoon
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Taking dietary habits into account: A computational method for modeling food choices that goes beyond price.

Authors:  Rahmatollah Beheshti; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Takeru Igusa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Relationship of a Special Acidified Milk Protein Drink with Cognitive Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Yoshie Saito; Natsuko Murata; Teruyuki Noma; Hiroyuki Itoh; Mitsunori Kayano; Kimihide Nakamura; Tadasu Urashima
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Food Insecurity and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adolescents.

Authors:  Shannon M Robson; Alicia J Lozano; Mia Papas; Freda Patterson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  The "Motor of the Day": Parent and School-Age Children's Cognitions, Barriers, and Supports for Breakfast.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Eck; Colleen L Delaney; Rashel L Clark; Miriam P Leary; Karla Pagan Shelnutt; Melissa D Olfert; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Lung Function, Dietary Intake, and Weight Status in Children with Persistent Asthma from Low-Income, Urban Communities.

Authors:  E Whitney Evans; Daphne Koinis-Mitchell; Sheryl J Kopel; Elissa Jelalian
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The Role of District Wellness Policies in Encouraging Student Participation in the School Breakfast Program, United States.

Authors:  Julien Leider; Wanting Lin; Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter; Lindsey Turner; Jamie F Chriqui
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Universal School Meals and Associations with Student Participation, Attendance, Academic Performance, Diet Quality, Food Security, and Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juliana F W Cohen; Amelie A Hecht; Gabriella M McLoughlin; Lindsey Turner; Marlene B Schwartz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.