Literature DB >> 26865622

Multifaceted Contributions by Different Regions of the Orbitofrontal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Probabilistic Reversal Learning.

Gemma L Dalton1, Nena Y Wang1, Anthony G Phillips1, Stan B Floresco2.   

Abstract

Different subregions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contribute to the ability to respond flexibly to changes in reward contingencies, with the medial versus orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) subregions contributing differentially to processes such as set-shifting and reversal learning. To date, the manner in which these regions may facilitate reversal learning in situations involving reward uncertainty remains relatively unexplored. We investigated the involvement of five distinct regions of the rat OFC (lateral and medial) and medial PFC (prelimbic, infralimbic, and anterior cingulate) on probabilistic reversal learning wherein "correct" versus "incorrect" responses were rewarded on 80% and 20% of trials, respectively. Contingencies were reversed repeatedly within a session. In well trained rats, inactivation of the medial or lateral OFC induced dissociable impairments in performance (indexed by fewer reversals completed) when outcomes were probabilistic, but not when they were assured. Medial OFC inactivation impaired probabilistic learning during the first discrimination, increased perseverative responding and reduced sensitivity to positive and negative feedback, suggestive of a deficit in incorporating information about previous action outcomes to guide subsequent behavior. Lateral OFC inactivation preferentially impaired performance during reversal phases. In contrast, prelimbic inactivation caused an apparent improvement in performance by increasing the number of reversals completed. This was associated with enhanced sensitivity to recently rewarded actions and reduced sensitivity to negative feedback. Infralimbic inactivation had no effect, whereas the anterior cingulate appeared to play a permissive role in this form of reversal learning. These results clarify the dissociable contributions of different regions of the frontal lobes to probabilistic learning. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The ability to adjust behavior in response to changes involving uncertain or probabilistic reward contingencies is an essential survival skill that is impaired in a variety of psychiatric disorders. It is well established that different forms of cognitive flexibility are mediated by anatomically distinct regions of the frontal lobes when reinforcement contingencies are assured, however, less is known about the contribution of these regions to probabilistic reinforcement learning. Here we show that different regions of the orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex make distinct contributions to probabilistic reversal learning. These findings provide novel information about the complex interplay between frontal lobe regions in mediating these processes and accordingly provide insight into possible pathophysiology that underlies impairments in cognitive flexibility observed in mental illnesses.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/361996-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  orbitofrontal cortex; prelimbic cortex; probabilistic; reversal learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26865622      PMCID: PMC6602019          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3366-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; M L Kringelbach; E T Rolls; J Hornak; C Andrews
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  R Elliott; R J Dolan; C D Frith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Involvement of rodent prefrontal cortex subregions in strategy switching.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; C Wilcox; M Raso; R P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Luke Clark; Adrian M Owen; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans.

Authors:  D Ongür; J L Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Orbitofrontal lesions in rats impair reversal but not acquisition of go, no-go odor discriminations.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Summer L Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Barrry Setlow
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat.

Authors:  J M Birrell; V J Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  R D Rogers; A M Owen; H C Middleton; E J Williams; J D Pickard; B J Sahakian; T W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  55 in total

1.  Persistent Alterations of Accumbal Cholinergic Interneurons and Cognitive Dysfunction after Adolescent Intermittent Ethanol Exposure.

Authors:  E Galaj; B T Kipp; S B Floresco; L M Savage
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease.

Authors:  Milena Girotti; Samantha M Adler; Sarah E Bulin; Elizabeth A Fucich; Denisse Paredes; David A Morilak
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Maternal immune activation impairs cognitive flexibility and alters transcription in frontal cortex.

Authors:  Dionisio A Amodeo; Chi-Yu Lai; Omron Hassan; Eran A Mukamel; M Margarita Behrens; Susan B Powell
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Infusions of Nerve Growth Factor Into the Developing Frontal Cortex Leads to Deficits in Behavioral Flexibility and Increased Perseverance.

Authors:  Sagar J Desai; Brian L Allman; Nagalingam Rajakumar
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence.

Authors:  David E Moorman
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Activation of D1 receptors affects human reactivity and flexibility to valued cues.

Authors:  Alexander Jetter; Philippe N Tobler; Alexander Soutschek; Rouba Kozak; Nicholas de Martinis; William Howe; Christopher J Burke; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Differential effects of d- and l-enantiomers of govadine on distinct forms of cognitive flexibility and a comparison with dopaminergic drugs.

Authors:  Gemma L Dalton; Stan B Floresco; Anthony G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Mechanisms underlying prelimbic prefrontal cortex mGlu3/mGlu5-dependent plasticity and reversal learning deficits following acute stress.

Authors:  Max E Joffe; Chiaki I Santiago; Branden J Stansley; James Maksymetz; Rocco G Gogliotti; Julie L Engers; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Cognitive flexibility impairment and reduced frontal cortex BDNF expression in the ouabain model of mania.

Authors:  Dionisio A Amodeo; Gena Grospe; Hui Zang; Yogesh Dwivedi; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Age and sex differences in behavioral flexibility, sensitivity to reward value, and risky decision-making.

Authors:  Sara R Westbrook; Emily R Hankosky; Megan R Dwyer; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.