Literature DB >> 26865082

A Cognitive-Affective Scale for Hurricane Risk Perception.

Craig W Trumbo1, Lori Peek2, Michelle A Meyer3, Holly L Marlatt1, Eve Gruntfest4, Brian D McNoldy5, Wayne H Schubert6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid measure of hurricane risk perception. The utility of such a measure lies in the need to understand how people make decisions when facing an evacuation order. This study included participants located within a 15-mile buffer of the Gulf and southeast Atlantic U.S. coasts. The study was executed as a three-wave panel with mail surveys in 2010-2012 (T0 baseline N = 629, 56%; T1 retention N = 427, 75%; T2 retention N = 350, 89%). An inventory based on the psychometric model was developed to discriminate cognitive and affective perceptions of hurricane risk, and included open-ended responses to solicit additional concepts in the T0 survey. Analysis of the T0 data modified the inventory and this revised item set was fielded at T1 and then replicated at T2 . The resulting scales were assessed for validity against existing measures for perception of hurricane risk, dispositional optimism, and locus of control. A measure of evacuation expectation was also examined as a dependent variable, which was significantly predicted by the new measures. The resulting scale was found to be reliable, stable, and largely valid against the comparison measures. Despite limitations involving sample size, bias, and the strength of some reliabilities, it was concluded that the measure has potential to inform approaches to hurricane preparedness efforts and advance planning for evacuation messages, and that the measure has good promise to generalize to other contexts in natural hazards as well as other domains of risk.
© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive-affective processes; hurricanes; natural disasters; risk perception

Year:  2016        PMID: 26865082     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  The closer I am, the safer I feel: The "distance proximity effect" of COVID-19 pandemic on individuals' risk assessment and irrational consumption.

Authors:  Shaobo Kevin Li; Zhe Zhang; Yue Liu; Sharon Ng
Journal:  Psychol Mark       Date:  2021-07-26

2.  RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?

Authors:  Peter M Wiedemann; Frederik Freudenstein; Christoph Böhmert; Joe Wiart; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Effects of Psychological Discomfort on Social Networking Site (SNS) Usage Intensity During COVID-19.

Authors:  Hyeon Jo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.