Literature DB >> 26864768

Locomotor sequence learning in visually guided walking.

Julia T Choi1, Peter Jensen2, Jens Bo Nielsen2.   

Abstract

Voluntary limb modifications must be integrated with basic walking patterns during visually guided walking. In this study we tested whether voluntary gait modifications can become more automatic with practice. We challenged walking control by presenting visual stepping targets that instructed subjects to modify step length from one trial to the next. Our sequence learning paradigm is derived from the serial reaction-time (SRT) task that has been used in upper limb studies. Both random and ordered sequences of step lengths were used to measure sequence-specific and sequence-nonspecific learning during walking. In addition, we determined how age (i.e., healthy young adults vs. children) and biomechanical factors (i.e., walking speed) affected the rate and magnitude of locomotor sequence learning. The results showed that healthy young adults (age 24 ± 5 yr,n= 20) could learn a specific sequence of step lengths over 300 training steps. Younger children (age 6-10 yr,n= 8) had lower baseline performance, but their magnitude and rate of sequence learning were the same compared with those of older children (11-16 yr,n= 10) and healthy adults. In addition, learning capacity may be more limited at faster walking speeds. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that spatial sequence learning can be integrated with a highly automatic task such as walking. These findings suggest that adults and children use implicit knowledge about the sequence to plan and execute leg movement during visually guided walking.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human; learning; locomotion; vision; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26864768      PMCID: PMC4869504          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00938.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Voluntary control of human gait: conditioning of magnetically evoked motor responses in a precision stepping task.

Authors:  M Schubert; A Curt; G Colombo; W Berger; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Locomotor primitives in newborn babies and their development.

Authors:  Nadia Dominici; Yuri P Ivanenko; Germana Cappellini; Andrea d'Avella; Vito Mondì; Marika Cicchese; Adele Fabiano; Tiziana Silei; Ambrogio Di Paolo; Carlo Giannini; Richard E Poppele; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Development of human locomotion.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Yuri P Ivanenko; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion.

Authors:  Trevor Drew; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  The best time to acquire new skills: age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Karolina Janacsek; József Fiser; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-04-05

7.  The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle.

Authors:  Kim Lajoie; Leigh W Bloomfield; Fraser J Nelson; Jaewon J Suh; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Childhood development of common drive to a human leg muscle during ankle dorsiflexion and gait.

Authors:  Tue Hvass Petersen; Mette Kliim-Due; Simon F Farmer; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Evidence of developmental differences in implicit sequence learning: an fMRI study of children and adults.

Authors:  Kathleen M Thomas; Ruskin H Hunt; Nathalie Vizueta; Tobias Sommer; Sarah Durston; Yihong Yang; Michael S Worden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The role of the motor cortex in the control of vigour of locomotor movements in the cat.

Authors:  I N Beloozerova; M G Sirota
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Sumire Sato; Ashley Cui; Julia T Choi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Don't watch your step: gaze behavior adapts with practice of a target stepping task.

Authors:  Alexander Cates; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Different neural substrates for precision stepping and fast online step adjustments in youth.

Authors:  Sharissa H A Corporaal; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Wouter Hoogkamer; Sima Chalavi; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Jacques Duysens; Stephan P Swinnen; Jolien Gooijers
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Increased central common drive to ankle plantar flexor and dorsiflexor muscles during visually guided gait.

Authors:  Peter Jensen; Nicole Jacqueline Jensen; Cecilie Ulbaek Terkildsen; Julia T Choi; Jens Bo Nielsen; Svend Sparre Geertsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-02

6.  Brain activity and upper limb movement analysis in children with Down syndrome undergoing transcranial direct current stimulation combined with virtual reality training: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jamile Benite Palma Lopes; Isabela Marques Miziara; Danial Kahani; Rodolfo Borges Parreira; Natalia de Almeida Carvalho Duarte; Roberta Delasta Lazzari; Lucas Villalta Santos; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro; Deborah Carvalho da Silva Cardoso; Juliana de Oliveira Hassel Mendes; Vera Lucia Dos Santos Alves; Iransé Oliveira Silva; Luis Vicente Oliveira; Bernard Arthur Conway; Manuela Galli; Veronica Cimolin; Claudia Santos Oliveira
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.