Bozena Bonnie Poksinska1, Malgorzata Fialkowska-Filipek2, Jon Engström1. 1. Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 2. Department of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lean healthcare is claimed to contribute to improved patient satisfaction, but there is limited evidence to support this notion. This study investigates how primary-care centres working with Lean define and improve value from the patient's perspective, and how the application of Lean healthcare influences patient satisfaction. METHODS: This paper contains two qualitative case studies and a quantitative study based on results from the Swedish National Patient Survey. Through the case studies, we investigated how primary-care organisations realised the principle of defining and improving value from the patient's perspective. In the quantitative study, we compared results from the patient satisfaction survey for 23 primary-care centres working with Lean with a control group of 23 care centres not working with Lean. We also analysed changes in patient satisfaction over time. RESULTS: Our case studies reveal that Lean healthcare implementations primarily target efficiency and little attention is paid to the patient's perspective. The quantitative study shows no significantly better results in patient satisfaction for primary-care centres working with Lean healthcare compared with those not working with Lean. Further, care centres working with Lean show no significant improvements in patient satisfaction over time. CONCLUSIONS: Lean healthcare implementations seem to have a limited impact on improving patient satisfaction. Care providers need to pay more attention to integrating the patient's perspective in the application of Lean healthcare. Value needs to be defined and value streams need to be improved based on both the knowledge and clinical expertise of care providers, and the preferences and needs of patients. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Lean healthcare is claimed to contribute to improved patient satisfaction, but there is limited evidence to support this notion. This study investigates how primary-care centres working with Lean define and improve value from the patient's perspective, and how the application of Lean healthcare influences patient satisfaction. METHODS: This paper contains two qualitative case studies and a quantitative study based on results from the Swedish National Patient Survey. Through the case studies, we investigated how primary-care organisations realised the principle of defining and improving value from the patient's perspective. In the quantitative study, we compared results from the patient satisfaction survey for 23 primary-care centres working with Lean with a control group of 23 care centres not working with Lean. We also analysed changes in patient satisfaction over time. RESULTS: Our case studies reveal that Lean healthcare implementations primarily target efficiency and little attention is paid to the patient's perspective. The quantitative study shows no significantly better results in patient satisfaction for primary-care centres working with Lean healthcare compared with those not working with Lean. Further, care centres working with Lean show no significant improvements in patient satisfaction over time. CONCLUSIONS: Lean healthcare implementations seem to have a limited impact on improving patient satisfaction. Care providers need to pay more attention to integrating the patient's perspective in the application of Lean healthcare. Value needs to be defined and value streams need to be improved based on both the knowledge and clinical expertise of care providers, and the preferences and needs of patients. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lean management; Patient satisfaction; Primary care
Authors: Wolfgang Munar; Birte Snilstveit; Jennifer Stevenson; Nilakshi Biswas; John Eyers; Gisela Butera; Theresa Baffour; Ligia E Aranda Journal: Gates Open Res Date: 2018-11-02
Authors: Elina Reponen; Thomas G Rundall; Stephen M Shortell; Janet C Blodgett; Angelica Juarez; Ritva Jokela; Markku Mäkijärvi; Paulus Torkki Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Sinead Moffatt; Catherine Garry; Hannah McCann; Sean Paul Teeling; Marie Ward; Martin McNamara Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Monica Kaltenbrunner; Lars Bengtsson; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Hans Högberg; Maria Engström Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Agnieszka Zdęba-Mozoła; Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska; Tomasz Czapla; Michał Marczak; Remigiusz Kozłowski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 3.390