Literature DB >> 2686428

A prospective, randomized comparison of ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin as initial empiric therapy in neutropenic patients with fever.

K F Bayston1, S Want, J Cohen.   

Abstract

This study developed further clinical experience in using a single agent ("monotherapy") as empirical treatment for neutropenic patients with fever, and compared the safety and toxicity of two candidate agents, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. A prospective, randomized, single-center efficacy and safety comparison was conducted of intravenous ciprofloxacin, 200 mg every 12 hours, and ceftazidime, 2 g every eight hours, as initial empirical therapy in neutropenic patients with fever. Regimens were modified as necessary, guided by laboratory results and/or the clinical condition. Response was evaluated at 72 hours and at the end of the neutropenia. Toxicity was evaluated by regular clinical examination and laboratory investigations. A total of 43 patients with 51 febrile neutropenic episodes were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to one of the two regimens. Five episodes were excluded from evaluation of efficacy because of protocol violations, leaving 46 evaluable episodes (21 ciprofloxacin, 25 ceftazidime). The two groups were well matched for risk factors for infection. There were no differences between the two groups in response rates either at 72 hours or at the end of neutropenia, although in the vast majority of patients some modification of the initial therapy was required. No patients died of uncontrolled bacterial infection. Superinfection with gram-positive cocci (often streptococci) was seen primarily in bone marrow transplant recipients who had been randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin. This study demonstrated that, in certain circumstances, a single antibiotic can be used successfully as initial empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. In this study, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin were generally of equal efficacy, but there appeared to be an increased incidence of streptococcal superinfection in bone marrow transplant recipients who received ciprofloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686428     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90078-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of combination antimicrobial therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.

Authors:  Eric Chamot; Emmanuelle Boffi El Amari; Peter Rohner; Christian Van Delden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A randomized study of imipenem compared to cefotaxime plus piperacillin as initial therapy of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  A Böhme; G Just-Nübling; L Bergmann; P M Shah; W Stille; D Hoelzer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high-dose ciprofloxacin versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as initial empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever.

Authors:  H Giamarellou; H P Bassaris; G Petrikkos; W Busch; M Voulgarelis; A Antoniadou; E Grouzi; N Zoumbos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; E Patz; U Frank; F D Daschner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Use of the quinolones for the prophylaxis and therapy of infections in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  G Maschmeyer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  R Davis; A Markham; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  C P Rains; H M Bryson; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.