Literature DB >> 2686425

Intravenous ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime in serious infections. A prospective, controlled clinical trial with third-party blinding.

J Sifuentes-Osornio1, A Macías, R I Amieva, A Ramos, G M Ruiz-Palacios.   

Abstract

Oral ciprofloxacin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of infections due to gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods. The efficacy and safety of intravenous ciprofloxacin was compared with that of intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of 59 patients with well-documented serious infections in a prospective, controlled, randomized study with a third-party blinding. Thirty-three patients were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 mg every 12 hours, plus a daily extra placebo dose); 26 patients were treated with ceftazidime (1 g every eight hours). The severity of the infections, underlying diseases, and demographic features were comparable in both groups, although there were more men in the ciprofloxacin group. For ciprofloxacin/ceftazidime treatments, respectively, the evaluated infections were: pyelonephritis (16 patients/nine patients), pneumonia (three/five), soft-tissue infections (four/zero), spontaneous peritonitis (five/two), primary bacteremia (three/eight), and other (two/two). Isolated pathogens included: Escherichia coli (22/12), Klebsiella sp. (five/four), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (two/three), Haemophilus influenzae (one/one), Proteus mirabilis (two/zero), Proteus vulgaris (one/zero), Salmonella sp. (zero/two), Plesiomonas shigelloides (one/zero), and others (one/four). The clinical responses were cure or improvement in 31 ciprofloxacin cases/21 ceftazidime cases; failure, zero/four; and indeterminate, two/one. The bacteriologic responses were eradication in 28 ciprofloxacin cases/22 ceftazidime cases; persistence, one/three; and indeterminate, four/one. Mild intolerance occurred in three ciprofloxacin cases and two ceftazidime cases. A mild increase in serum hepatic enzymes was observed in two patients in each group. Superinfections occurred in five patients: enterococcal septicemia (zero/two) and urinary tract infections (one/two). The results presented suggest that intravenous ciprofloxacin is an effective and safe antimicrobial agent for the treatment of serious infections, with an efficacy comparable with that of ceftazidime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin. An additional advantage seems to be a lower rate of superinfections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686425     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based case report. Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  K Soares-Weiser; M Paul; M Brezis; L Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

Review 2.  Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Noa Eliakim-Raz; Eyal Robenshtok; Daphna Shefet; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Liat Vidal; Mical Paul; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 3.  Treatment of intra-abdominal infections with quinolones.

Authors:  J A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Antibiotics for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Norberto C Chavez-Tapia; Karla Soares-Weiser; Mayer Brezis; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

5.  Choosing Optimal Antibiotics for the Treatment of Patients Infected With Enterobacteriaceae: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Ruiying Han; Mengmeng Teng; Ying Zhang; Tao Zhang; Taotao Wang; Jiaojiao Chen; Sihan Li; Bo Yang; Yaling Shi; Yalin Dong; Yan Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.