| Literature DB >> 26863532 |
Ricardo García-González1, Arantza Aldezabal2, Nere Amaia Laskurain2, Antoni Margalida3,4, Claude Novoa5.
Abstract
The Pyrenean rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta pyrenaica) lives at one of the southernmost limits of the ptarmigan range. Their small population sizes and the impacts of global changes are limiting factors in the conservation of this threatened subspecies. An effective conservation policy requires precise basic knowledge of a species' food and habitat requirements, information that is practically non-existent for this Pyrenean population. Here, we describe the diet of a ptarmigan population in the Eastern Pyrenees, the environmental factors influencing its variability and the relationship between diet floristic composition and quality. Diet composition was determined by microhistological analysis of faeces and diet quality was estimated from free-urate faecal N content. Our results show that grouse diet is based mainly on arctic-alpine shrubs of the Ericaceae family, as well as dwarf willows (Salix spp.) and Dryas octopetala. The most frequently consumed plant species was Rhododendron ferrugineum, but its abundance in the diet was negatively related to the diet nitrogen content. Conversely, the abundance of Salix spp., grass leaves and arthropods increased the nitrogen content of the diet. Seasonality associated with snow-melting contributed the most to variability in the Pyrenean ptarmigan diet, differentiating winter from spring/summer diets. The latter was characterised by a high consumption of dwarf willows, flowers, arthropods and tender forb leaves. Geographic area and sex-age class influenced diet variability to a lesser extent. Current temperature increases in the Pyrenees due to global warming may reduce the persistence and surface area of snow-packs where preferred plants for rock ptarmigan usually grow, thus reducing food availability. The high consumption of Rh. ferrugineum characterised the diet of the Pyrenean population. Given the toxicity of this plant for most herbivores, its potential negative effect on Pyrenean ptarmigan populations should be evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26863532 PMCID: PMC4749312 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the study area in the eastern French Pyrenees.
The map represents the four zones (M = Mantet, CV-R = Collada Verda—Roja, H = Sept Hommes—Tres vents, C = Canigou—Barbet) in which faecal samples were collected. On some occasions, faecal samples were collected in the same sampling plot (i.e. breeding pair, female with chick).
Fig 2Monthly/seasonal variation of Pyrenean ptarmigan diets in the sampled years grouped by simplified morphological categories.
Autumn (O-D) and winter (J-A) months have been grouped.
Forward stepwise CCA and reduced models for the five explanatory (constraining) matrices in which the response matrix is diet matrix (i.e., botanical composition of ptarmigan diet).
TVE% (x) = total variation explained in percentage (TVE% of reduced model); λ1, λ2, λ3 are the eigenvalues of the first three axes. Trace is the sum of all canonical eigenvalues. Only significant variables (p<0.1) have been indicated. The significant TVE% is showed in bold. In the case of dummy variables, one level (category) was deleted to avoid collinearity problems when fitting the model: May to June (in season matrix), Collada Verda-Roja (in zone matrix), juvenile (in sex-age matrix), 2002 (in year matrix).
| Constraining matrix | TVE% | Reduced model | λ1 | λ2 | λ3 | F-ratio | p | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full model | 0.359 | 0.123 | 0.549 | 7.55 | 0.001 | 0.48 | ||
| 9.58 | 0.001 | 0.32 | ||||||
| 5.11 | 0.001 | 0.16 | ||||||
| 10.4 ( | Full model | 0.275 | 0.056 | 0.028 | 3.58 | 0.001 | 0.36 | |
| 8.07 | 0.001 | 0.27 | ||||||
| 0.130 | 0.605 | 0.517 | 3.69 | 0.001 | 0.13 | |||
| 4.1 ( | Full model | 0.127 | 0.017 | 0.566 | 2.02 | 0.008 | 0.14 | |
| 2.40 | 0.009 | 0.09 | ||||||
| 1.61 | 0.097 | 0.05 | ||||||
| 3.3 ( | Full model | 0.095 | 0.019 | 0.610 | 1.60 | 0.06 | 0.11 | |
| 2.41 | 0.012 | 0.09 |
Fig 3Partial CCA ordination diagram (with season as explicative matrix, and zone as covariable matrix), in which significant seasons are represented as vectors.
Abbreviations for plant categories: Calvul = Calluna vulgaris; Rhofer = Rhododendron ferrugineum; Salix = Salix spp.; Vac = Vaccinium spp.; L = Leaves; F = Flowers; Fr = Fruits; S = Stem; B = Buds.