Literature DB >> 2686322

Diagnostic accuracy and role of immediate interpretation of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens from various sites.

J F Silverman1, J L Finley, K F O'Brien, D J Dabbs, H K Park, E W Larkin, H T Norris.   

Abstract

A statistical analysis of the accuracy of the immediate interpretation of 425 fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies from various sites was performed. Preliminary interpretation of Diff-Quik-stained smears was rendered within a few minutes after performing the FNA biopsy, using diagnostic terminology similar to that of a surgical pathology report. The immediate assessment was documented in the formal cytology report and compared to the final diagnosis. For the entire series, the immediate interpretation had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value (PV) of 98%, a negative PV of 95% and an efficiency of the test of 96%. There were 14 false-negative or falsely insufficient immediate interpretations and one false-positive immediate diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the immediate interpretation of FNA biopsies from specific sites was also calculated; FNA biopsies of the pancreas were the least accurate procedure, having a sensitivity of 60% but a specificity of 100%. The role of the immediate interpretation of FNA biopsies is similar to the use of frozen sections in surgical pathology. An immediate assessment can (1) determine whether an adequate specimen is present, (2) render a specific preliminary diagnosis, (3) guide further clinical investigations or treatment, and (4) determine whether ancillary studies are needed to make a more accurate or specific diagnosis from the FNA specimen. Our results indicate that the immediate interpretation of FNA biopsies is an accurate procedure that should be routinely employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of infectious diseases: a cytopathologist's perspective.

Authors:  C N Powers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Non-imaging-guided fine-needle aspiration of liver lesions: a retrospective study of 279 patients.

Authors:  Yeouda Edoute; Ehud Malberger; Orly Tibon-Fishe; Nimer Assy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of radiologically detected abdominal lesions.

Authors:  C J R Stewart; J Coldewey; I S Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Immediate assessment of fine needle aspiration cytology of lung.

Authors:  C J Stewart; I S Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy?

Authors:  Fahad Alsohaibani; Safwat Girgis; Gurpal Singh Sandha
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Feasibility of image-guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy in the BATTLE lung trial.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Edward S Kim; J Jack Lee; Joe E Ensor; Marshall E Hicks; Ximing Tang; George R Blumenschein; Christine M Alden; Jeremy J Erasmus; Anne Tsao; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Small (< or = 3 cm) hepatic lesions. Results of sonographically guided fine-needle biopsy in 385 patients.

Authors:  F Fornari; C Filice; G L Rapaccini; E Caturelli; L Cavanna; G Civardi; M Di Stasi; E Buscarini; L Buscarini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Actinomycosis of the neck: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Authors:  I S Hong; H M Mezghebe; T E Gaiter; J Lofton
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Fast drying of Fine Needle Aspiration slides using a hand held fan: impact on turn around time and staining quality.

Authors:  Mirza A Baig; Lamia Fathallah; Jining Feng; Mujtaba Husain; David G Grignon; Mousa A Al-Abbadi
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Rapid assessment of fine needle aspiration and the final diagnosis--how often and why the diagnoses are changed.

Authors:  Carolyn Woon; Ricardo H Bardales; Michael W Stanley; Edward B Stelow
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.