| Literature DB >> 26862366 |
Yasuhiro Miyazaki1, Shuji Takiguchi1, Tsuyoshi Takahashi1, Yukinori Kurokawa1, Tomoki Makino1, Makoto Yamasaki1, Kiyokazu Nakajima1, Masaki Mori1, Yuichiro Doki1.
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common condition that results from locally advanced malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as pancreatic, gastric, and other carcinomas. Two types of procedures for malignant GOO, namely, gastrojejunostomy (GJ) with laparotomy or a laparoscopic approach and endoscopic stenting (ES), are currently available. Although numerous previous reports have clarified the benefits and drawbacks of each procedure, whether GJ or ES should be used in patients with GOO that results from gastric cancer who may have a longer life expectancy than patients with other malignancies has not been determined. In this review, which focuses on gastric cancer-induced GOO, we analyzed the two systematic reviews and a meta-analysis that compared GJ and ES and outlined the current status of GOO treatment. We also provide an updated review that includes laparoscopic GJ. Various data from 13 studies in one review and 6 studies in another review were analyzed. Although the main results of the present review indicated that both GJ and ES were efficacious treatments in patients with GOO that resulted from gastric cancer, current evidence suggests that GJ may be the preferable procedure given its good performance status and improved prognosis in gastric cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic stenting; Gastric cancer; Gastric outlet obstruction; Gastrojejunostomy; Review
Year: 2016 PMID: 26862366 PMCID: PMC4734975 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc