| Literature DB >> 26862342 |
Fariba Ghodsbin1, Marzieh Safaei2, Iran Jahanbin3, Mohammad Ali Ostovan4, Sareh Keshvarzi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positive thinking which is derived from an optimistic view toward the universe and plays an important role in the incidence of better and a more targeted behavior among human beings. It can improve spiritual health in the individuals through increased communication with God and thanksgiving and accelerate the healing process. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the effect of positive thinking on the level of spiritual health in the patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) referred to Imam Reza specialty and subspecialty clinic in Shiraz, Iran.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease; Spiritual; Thinking; Training
Year: 2015 PMID: 26862342 PMCID: PMC4738044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ARYA Atheroscler ISSN: 1735-3955
Figure 1The process of study on spiritual well-being in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)
Frequency distribution of participants’ demographic characteristics
| Variable | Intervention group (n = 38) | Control group (n = 36) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex [n (%)] | |||
| Female | 23 (60.5) | 18 (50.0) | 0.363 |
| Male | 15 (39.5) | 18 (50.0) | |
| Marital status [n (%)] | |||
| Married | 33 (86.6) | 29 (80.6) | 0.463 |
| Widow | 5 (13.2) | 7 (19.4) | |
| Educational status [n (%)] | |||
| Under graduate | 27 (71.1) | 26 (72.2) | 0.535 |
| Graduate | 11 (28.9) | 10 (27.8) | |
| Occupational status [n (%)] | |||
| Clerk | 5 (13.2) | 5 (13.9) | 0.298 |
| Retired | 14 (36.8) | 10 (27.8) | |
| Self-employed [n (%)] | 2 (5.3) | 7 (19.4) | |
| Housewife [n (%)] | 17 (44.7) | 14 (38.9) | |
| Monthly income (Rials) [n (%)] | |||
| < 6 million | 12 (34.2) | 10 (27.8) | 0.754 |
| 6-10 million | 18 (47.4) | 18 (50.0) | |
| > 10 million | 7 (18.4) | 8 (22.2) |
chi-square test
Comparison of spiritual well-being total score and its dimensions before and after intervention as well as 1 month after the intervention in the intervention and control groups
| SWB mean score | Group | Time | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | 1 month follow-up | |||||
| (mean ± SD) | (mean ± SD) | (mean ± SD) | |||||
| EWB | Intervention | 38.34 ± 7.15 | 42.47 ± 7.10 | 43.47 ± 7.31 | < 0.001 | 0.863 | 0.002 |
| Control | 40.97 ± 10.31 | 40.72 ± 10.50 | 41.58 ± 10.96 | ||||
| RWB | Intervention | 50.36 ± 7.49 | 52.81 ± 5.72 | 53.15 ± 7.06 | 0.706 | 0.890 | 0.001 |
| Control | 53.47 ± 7.58 | 51.97 ± 7.58 | 51.52 ± 7.81 | ||||
| Total SWB score | Intervention | 88.71 ± 12.50 | 95.28 ± 11.02 | 96.63 ± 12.58 | 0.014 | 0.975 | < 0.001 |
| Control | 94.45 ± 16.01 | 92.70 ± 16.26 | 93.19 ± 17.55 | ||||
Analysis of variance of repeated measures test.
SWB: Spiritual well-being; EWB: Existential well-being; RWB: Religious well-being; SD: Standard deviation
Figure 2Comparison of spiritual well-being (SWB) levels (total score) before and after intervention and 1 month follow-up in the intervention and control groups *No patients reported a low level of SWB