| Literature DB >> 26862303 |
Przemysław Łukasz Mikołajczak1, Bogdan Kędzia2, Marcin Ożarowski3, Radosław Kujawski2, Anna Bogacz4, Joanna Bartkowiak-Wieczorek5, Wojciech Białas6, Agnieszka Gryszczyńska2, Waldemar Buchwald7, Michał Szulc8, Natalia Wasiak8, Małgorzata Górska-Paukszta5, Justyna Baraniak2, Bogusław Czerny9, Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz10.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate analgesic activity ("hot plate" test), anti-inflammatory activity (carrageenan-induced paw edema) and locomotor activity in rats under the influence of three fractions of Chelidonium majus herb extract: full water extract (FWE), protein enriched fraction (PEF), and non-protein fraction (NPF). Effects of the fractions on the level of chosen cytokines and their mRNA levels were also assessed using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration as a proinflammatory cue. All fractions and diclofenac did not affect the locomotor activity of rats in comparison with the control group. FWE and PEF three hours after administration showed statistically significant analgesic activities comparable to morphine (p < 0.05). A slight reduction in rat paw edema was observed after three (comparable with diclofenac) and six hours in the NPF group. FWE revealed a statistically significant pro-inflammatory effect after three hours in comparison with the control group. Peripheral IL-1 and IL-4 cytokine concentrations were reduced under FWE and NPF, PEF fractions. The combination of FWE, PEF and NPF together with LPS showed only the effects of LPS. We suggest that protein enriched fraction (PEF) produced centrally mediated (morphine-like) analgesic action, whereas the anti-inflammatory potential was shown only after LPS-induced inflammation. The precise mechanisms involved in the production of anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory responses of studied fractions are not completely understood, but they may be caused rather by the presence of protein more than alkaloids-enriched fraction. This fraction of the extract could be used as an alternative therapy for the prevention of inflammatory-related diseases in the future, but further studies are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Chelidonium majus aqueous extract; LPS–induced rats; analgesic; anti-inflammatory; mRNA; non-protein fraction; proinflammatory cytokines; protein enriched fraction
Year: 2016 PMID: 26862303 PMCID: PMC4737735 DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2015.54607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Eur J Immunol ISSN: 1426-3912 Impact factor: 2.085
Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of fractions of water extract of Ch. majus
| Group | Locomotor activity test | Hot plate test | Carrageenan-induced paw edema | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [number of impulses/5 min] | time [s] | ΔG [ml] | |||
| t = 3 h | t = 6 h | t = 3 h | t = 6 h | ||
| control | 646 ±92 | 31.9 ±2.3 | 39.9 ±2.9 | 1.62 ±0.09 | 1.51 ±0.10 |
| morphine | 325 ±63 | 44.2 ±1.2 | 53.2 ±2.6 | – | – |
| diclofenac | 703 ±64 | 39.7 ±6.4 | 47.4 ±2.3 | 1.25 ±0.10 | 0.75 ±0.10 |
| FWE | 499 ±63 | 51.7 ±2.7 | 48.9 ±1.5 | 2.15 ±0.08 | 1.73 ±0.08 |
| PEF | 662 ±66 | 50.1 ±3.1 | 42.8 ±3.0 | 1.94 ±0.13 | 1.90 ±0.10 |
| NPF | 714 ±82 | 40.7 ±6.1 | 45.2 ±5.7 | 1.50 ±0.19 | 1.21 ±0.18 |
values are means ± SEM; n = 6-7 in each group
FWE – full water extract; PEF – protein enriched fraction; NPF – non-protein fraction; t – time after administration of the substance (3 h and 6 h); ΔG – value expressing change in paw's thickness against baseline (before inflammation) after 3/6 h
significant difference vs. control group; p < 0.05 or p < 0.1, respectively
HPLC quantification of alkaloids in extracts of Ch. majus
| Rf | Compound | FWE | NPF | PEF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 (9) | coptisine | 628.9 | 509.2 | 404.3 |
| 8.4 | chelidonine | 109.7 | 59.3 | 134.3 |
| 10.4 | sanguinarine | – | – | 19.0 |
| 10.7 | berberine | 23.4 | 17.1 | 17.7 |
| 11.1 | chelerythrine | 0.67 | 1.16 | 0.29 |
FWE – full water extract; PEF – protein enriched fraction; NPF – non-protein fraction
Fig. 1LPS-induced IL-1 (panel A), Il-4 (Panel B) and IL-6 (Panel C) serum levels of rats treated with fractions of water extract of Ch. majus. Data are expressed as means
Fig. 2LPS-induced IL-1 mRNA (panel A), IL-6 mRNA (Panel B) and TLR1 mRNA (Panel C) expression of rats treated with fractions of water extract of Ch. majus. Data are expressed as means