OBJECTIVE: Adolescents and young adults remain at high risk for new HIV infections and for unknowingly transmitting the virus to others. Yet, they have demonstrated low rates of testing due to barriers such as stigma and difficulty accessing testing services. Few existing programs have successfully integrated family planning and HIV care services to improve testing and diagnosis rates among young adults and adolescents, particularly those of minority groups. This study describes the process of implementing HIV services into family planning clinics and how to train staff in routine, opt-out testing. METHODS: This study used HIV screening data from 10 family planning clinics serving adolescents and young adults in Houston, Texas. A total of 34,299 patients were tested for HIV during a 48-month study period, from January 2010 through December 2014. RESULTS: Patients tested included minors <18 years of age (25.5%), males (22.8%), and individuals who had missed opportunities for HIV testing at other health-care settings. From the opt-in period (2006-2007) to the routine, opt-out period (2008-2010), the yearly average number of tests administered more than doubled; the yearly average increased again by 50% from the routine, opt-out period to the routine, rapid period (2011-2014). Eighty-eight (0.3%) patients were diagnosed with HIV, a higher seropositivity rate than CDC's recommended threshold of 0.1% for settings where routine screening is warranted. CONCLUSION: Routine, opt-out HIV testing integrated into family planning clinics increased rates of testing acceptance, receipt of test results, and HIV-positive diagnoses among adolescents and young adults.
OBJECTIVE: Adolescents and young adults remain at high risk for new HIV infections and for unknowingly transmitting the virus to others. Yet, they have demonstrated low rates of testing due to barriers such as stigma and difficulty accessing testing services. Few existing programs have successfully integrated family planning and HIV care services to improve testing and diagnosis rates among young adults and adolescents, particularly those of minority groups. This study describes the process of implementing HIV services into family planning clinics and how to train staff in routine, opt-out testing. METHODS: This study used HIV screening data from 10 family planning clinics serving adolescents and young adults in Houston, Texas. A total of 34,299 patients were tested for HIV during a 48-month study period, from January 2010 through December 2014. RESULTS:Patients tested included minors <18 years of age (25.5%), males (22.8%), and individuals who had missed opportunities for HIV testing at other health-care settings. From the opt-in period (2006-2007) to the routine, opt-out period (2008-2010), the yearly average number of tests administered more than doubled; the yearly average increased again by 50% from the routine, opt-out period to the routine, rapid period (2011-2014). Eighty-eight (0.3%) patients were diagnosed with HIV, a higher seropositivity rate than CDC's recommended threshold of 0.1% for settings where routine screening is warranted. CONCLUSION: Routine, opt-out HIV testing integrated into family planning clinics increased rates of testing acceptance, receipt of test results, and HIV-positive diagnoses among adolescents and young adults.
Authors: Tanya L Kowalczyk Mullins; Paula K Braverman; Lorah D Dorn; Linda M Kollar; Jessica A Kahn Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Alicen B Spaulding; Deborah Bain Brickley; Caitlin Kennedy; Lucy Almers; Laura Packel; Joy Mirjahangir; Gail Kennedy; Lynn Collins; Kevin Osborne; Michael Mbizvo Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Rebecca V Liddicoat; Nicholas J Horton; Renata Urban; Elizabeth Maier; Demian Christiansen; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Daniel Grossman; Maricianah Onono; Sara J Newmann; Cinthia Blat; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Starley B Shade; Rachel L Steinfeld; Craig R Cohen Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Merhawi T Gebrezgi; Daniel E Mauck; Diana M Sheehan; Kristopher P Fennie; Elena Cyrus; Abraham Degarege; Mary Jo Trepka Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Mary-Margaret Andrews; Deborah S Storm; Carolyn K Burr; Erika Aaron; Mary Jo Hoyt; Anne Statton; Shannon Weber Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Mobolaji Ibitoye; Alex S Bennett; Mona Bugaghis; Lauren S Chernick; Don C Des Jarlais; Ian David Aronson Journal: Behav Med Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.879
Authors: Kadija M Tahlil; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Titi Gbajabiamila; Juliet Iwelunmor; Oliver Ezechi; Joseph D Tucker; Ucheoma Nwaozuru; David Oladele; Adesola Z Musa; Ifeoma Idigbe; Jane Okwuzu; Agatha N David; Tajudeen A Bamidele; Collins O Airhihenbuwa; Nora E Rosenberg; Weiming Tang; Jason J Ong; Donaldson F Conserve Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Matthew R Golden; Jeffery Duchin; Lisa D Chew; Jane H Huntington; Nancy Sugg; Sara Jackson; Aric Lane; Monica Pecha; Elizabeth Barash; John Scott Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 3.835