Literature DB >> 26861893

Long-Term Pain Reduction Does Not Imply Improved Functional Outcome in Patients Treated With Combined Supraorbital and Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Migraine.

Shannon W Clark1, Chengyuan Wu1, David W Boorman1, Nohra Chalouhi1, Mario Zanaty1, Michael Oshinsky2, William B Young2, Stephen D Silberstein2, Ashwini D Sharan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual supraorbital and occipital nerve stimulation (SONS and ONS) have shown promising efficacy in treating primary headaches. However, its functional outcome is not well studied.
OBJECTIVE: To present functional outcome studies of combined SONS and ONS for chronic migraine using verified metrics.
METHOD: Consecutive patients with both SONS and ONS assessed with Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and Beck Depression Index (BDI) both preoperatively and postoperatively were studied. Selected predictor variables included patients with ≥50% improvement of pain, disability status, number of years from diagnosis to implantation, and narcotic use. Functional outcome variables included net improvement of ranked MIDAS and BDI scores. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to assess the correlation between the outcome and predictor variables.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (12 female; average age 52 years old) were studied. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 80 months (average 44.5; σ = 21.4 months). At most recent follow-up, eight patients had a positive response (≥50% improvement in headache), which was the only predictor of functional outcome (total MIDAS, MIDAS-B, and BDI) (p = 0.021). Of note, improvement in functional outcome was only significant during the perioperative 3-6 months period and not throughout long-term follow-up. Among the predictor variables, a strong inverse correlation was found between disability status and positive response to stimulation (r = -0.582).
CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of studies in quality of life, productivity, and psychosocial aspects with peripheral nerve stimulation therapy for headache. Patients with a positive response to SONS and ONS also reported overall improvement in their functional status as reflected by MIDAS and BDI in the perioperative period. Unfortunately, this effect waned over the long-term follow-up.
© 2016 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined stimulation; functional outcome; migraine; neuromodulation; occipital nerve stimulation; supraorbital nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861893     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Invasive and Non-invasive Electrical Pericranial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Primary Headaches.

Authors:  Kevin D'Ostilio; Delphine Magis
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-11

2.  An unusual case of lead migration in occipital nerve stimulation: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Rafael Caiado Vencio; Paulo Eduardo Albuquerque Zito Raffa; André Costa Corral Ponce; Bruno Pricoli Malamud; César Cozar Pacheco; Paulo Roberto Franceschini; Roger Thomaz Rotta Medeiros; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients.

Authors:  Sarah Miller; Laurence Watkins; Manjit Matharu
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 4.  Update of Neuromodulation in Chronic Migraine.

Authors:  Hsiangkuo Yuan; Tzu-Ying Chuang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-11-11

5.  Occipital Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Migraine: The Relationship Between Perceived Sensory Quality, Perceived Sensory Location, and Clinical Efficacy-A Prospective, Observational, Non-Interventional Study.

Authors:  Carl H Göbel; Anna Göbel; Uwe Niederberger; Axel Heinze; Katja Heinze-Kuhn; Christoph Meinecke; Hubertus M Mehdorn; Dirk Rasche; Hartmut Göbel
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.