Literature DB >> 26861741

Field study on evaluation of the efficacy and usability of two disinfectants for drinking water treatment at small cattle breeders and dairy cattle farms.

Asmaa N Mohammed1.   

Abstract

The hygienic quality of drinking water for cattle originated from different sources together with the efficacy and usability of two types of disinfectants against waterborne pathogens were assessed for small cattle breeders and dairy cattle farms. A total of 120 drinking water samples were collected from water troughs representing three different water sources commonly used for cattle drinking (tap, underground and surface water; n = 65, 25, and 30, respectively). Collected samples were cultured for isolation and identification of pathogenic bacteria using serological techniques and PCR. The bactericidal efficacy of the disinfectants, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 50%, at different concentrations were evaluated by the determination of total viable and coliform counts of water prior and postwater treatment. In small cattle breeders, Escherichia coli was the most prevalent bacterial isolates from surface water (56.7%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (36.7%), Salmonella spp. (26.7%), Streptococcus faecalis (23.3%), Shigella flexneri (16.7%), Proteus spp. (16.7%), and Klebsiella pneumonae (10.0 %) at X(2) = 9, P ≤ 0.01. Prior to the use of disinfectants, the averages of total bacterial and coliform counts were the highest in surface water (3.56 × 10(7), 240.0, and 38.0 CFU/100 ml, respectively). It has been found that hydrogen peroxide 50% at a concentration of 35 mg/l had a lethal effect (100 %) on indicator microorganisms compared with NaDCC at concentration of 2 mg/l. In conclusion, the higher bacterial contaminants in drinking water were found in surface water followed by tap water, particularly for small cattle breeders. Therefore, the usage of more hygienic water troughs with their regular treatment by hydrogen peroxide 50% at concentration of 35 mg/l is highly recommended to control waterborne bacteria and consequently improve and maintain the animal health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Cattle; Disinfectants; Drinking water; Waterborne pathogens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861741     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5147-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  12 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Detection of sorbitol-negative and sorbitol-positive Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, and Salmonella spp. in dairy farm environmental samples.

Authors:  S E Murinda; L T Nguyen; H M Nam; R A Almeida; S J Headrick; S P Oliver
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Simultaneous detection and differentiation of Escherichia coli populations from environmental freshwaters by means of sequence variations in a fragment of the beta-D-glucuronidase gene.

Authors:  A H Farnleitner; N Kreuzinger; G G Kavka; S Grillenberger; J Rath; R L Mach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The effect of a new sewage treatment plant on faecal indicator numbers, campylobacters and bathing water compliance in Morecambe Bay.

Authors:  K Obiri-Danso; K Jones
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Preharvest control of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle.

Authors:  J T LeJeune; A N Wetzel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Cattle water troughs as reservoirs of Escherichia coli O157.

Authors:  J T LeJeune; T E Besser; D D Hancock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Escherichia coli: on-farm contamination of animals.

Authors:  J M Fairbrother; E Nadeau
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.181

8.  Analytical comparison of nine PCR primer sets designed to detect the presence of Escherichia coli/Shigella in water samples.

Authors:  Andrée F Maheux; François J Picard; Maurice Boissinot; Luc Bissonnette; Sonia Paradis; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Molecular basis of virulence in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Salmonella species from a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Mary A Bisi-Johnson; Chikwelu L Obi; Sandeep D Vasaikar; Kamaldeen A Baba; Toshio Hattori
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.181

Review 10.  Microbial contamination of drinking water and disease outcomes in developing regions.

Authors:  Nicholas John Ashbolt
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the efficacy of commonly used disinfectants against isolated chlorine-resistant strains from drinking water used in Egyptian cattle farms.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelhameed Kamal; Mahmoud Abdelaty Khalaf; Zakia Attia Mohamed Ahmed; Jakeen El Jakee
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-12-21

2.  Infectious Agents Identified by Real-Time PCR, Serology and Bacteriology in Blood and Peritoneal Exudate Samples of Cows Affected by Parietal Fibrinous Peritonitis after Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Salem Djebala; Julien Evrard; Fabien Gregoire; Damien Thiry; Calixte Bayrou; Nassim Moula; Arnaud Sartelet; Philippe Bossaert
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-13

3.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Several Bacteria Species Identified in the Peritoneal Exudate of Cows Affected by Parietal Fibrinous Peritonitis after Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Salem Djebala; Julien Evrard; Fabien Gregoire; Calixte Bayrou; Linde Gille; Justine Eppe; Hélène Casalta; Vincent Frisée; Nassim Moula; Arnaud Sartelet; Damien Thiry; Philippe Bossaert
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.