Literature DB >> 26861466

Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review.

Christos Iavazzo1,2, Ioannis D Gkegkes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Robotic hysterectomy is an alternative approach to the management of female genital tract pathology.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the till now available literature evidence on robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese patients.
RESULTS: In total, robotic assisted hysterectomy was performed on 2769 patients. The most frequent indication for robotic hysterectomy was endometrial carcinoma (1832 out of 2769 patients, 66.2 %). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and venous thromboembolism were the most common comorbidities reported. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 92 out of 2226 patients (4.1 %). The most frequent intraoperative complications for robotic hysterectomy were gastrointestinal injury (17 out of 2769 patients, 0.6 %), haemorrhage (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %) and bladder injury (five out of 2769 patients, 0.2 %). Wound infections/dehiscence (66 out of 2769 patients, 2.4 %), fever (56 out of 2769 patients, 2 %), pulmonary complications (55 out of 2769 patients, 1.9 %), urogenital complications (36 out of 2769 patients, 1.3 %) and postoperative ileus (28 out of 2769 patients, 1 %) were the most common postoperative complications. Death was reported in three out of 2769 patients (0.1 %). The ICU admitted patients were eight of 2226 patients (0.4 %).
CONCLUSION: The robotic technique, especially in obese, can optimize the surgical approach and recovery of such patients with equally if not better outcomes compared to open and/or laparoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Obese; Obesity; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861466     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4028-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted hysterectomy: patient selection and perspectives.

Authors:  Noam Smorgick
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-03-23

2.  Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.

Authors:  Rooma Sinha; Rupa Bana; Madhumathi Sanjay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Cancer field surgery in endometrial cancer: peritoneal mesometrial resection and targeted compartmental lymphadenectomy for locoregional control.

Authors:  Paul Buderath; Peter Rusch; Pawel Mach; Rainer Kimmig
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Changes in route of hysterectomy in Norway since introduction of robotic approach.

Authors:  M L Johanson; M Lieng
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?

Authors:  Marie Carbonnel; Gaby N Moawad; Mia Maria Tarazi; Aurelie Revaux; Titouan Kennel; Angéline Favre-Inhofer; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Different Classes of Obesity: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ilse Haveman; Willem Jan van Weelden; Elisabeth A Roovers; Arjan A Kraayenbrink; F Paul H L J Dijkhuizen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.