Literature DB >> 26861226

Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products.

Isabel Noya1, Xavier Aldea2, Carles M Gasol3, Sara González-García4, Maria José Amores2, Joan Colón5, Sergio Ponsá5, Isabel Roman6, Miguel A Rubio6, Eudald Casas7, María Teresa Moreira4, Jesús Boschmonart-Rives3.   

Abstract

A systematic tool to assess the Carbon Footprint (CF) and Water Footprint (WF) of pork production companies was developed and applied to representative Catalan companies. To do so, a cradle-to-gate environmental assessment was carried out by means of the LCA methodology, taking into account all the stages involved in the pork chain, from feed production to the processing of final products, ready for distribution. In this approach, the environmental results are reported based on eight different functional units (FUs) according to the main pork products obtained. With the aim of ensuring the reliability of the results and facilitating the comparison with other available reports, the Product Category Rules (PCR) for Catalan pork sector were also defined as a basis for calculations. The characterization results show fodder production as the main contributor to the global environmental burdens, with contributions higher than 76% regardless the environmental indicator or the life cycle stage considered, which is in agreement with other published data. In contrast, the results in terms of CF and WF lay above the range of values reported elsewhere. However, major discrepancies are mainly due to the differences in the co-products allocation criteria. In this sense, economic/physical allocation and/or system expansion have been mostly considered in literature. In contrast, no allocation was considered appropriate in this study, according to the characteristics of the industries and products under assessment; thus, the major impacts fall on the main product, which derives on comparatively higher environmental burdens. Finally, due to the relevance of fodder production in the overall impact assessment results, strategies to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions as well as water use associated to this stage were proposed in the pork supply chain.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; Environmental impacts; Global warming; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Pork value chain

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861226     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) for meat quality evaluation across the supply chain: Current and future trends.

Authors:  Wenyang Jia; Saskia van Ruth; Nigel Scollan; Anastasios Koidis
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Pathways to "5-a-day": modeling the health impacts and environmental footprints of meeting the target for fruit and vegetable intake in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Patricia Eustachio Colombo; James Milner; Pauline F D Scheelbeek; Anna Taylor; Alexandr Parlesak; Thomas Kastner; Owen Nicholas; Liselotte S Elinder; Alan D Dangour; Rosemary Green
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Effect of different cleaning procedures on water use and bacterial levels in weaner pig pens.

Authors:  Shilpi Misra; Corina E van Middelaar; Kieran Jordan; John Upton; Amy J Quinn; Imke J M de Boer; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mitigating spread of contamination in meat supply chain management using deep learning.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Amani; Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.